My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-03-05_REVISION - M1977348 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977348
>
2019-03-05_REVISION - M1977348 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 1:08:19 PM
Creation date
3/15/2019 1:49:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977348
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/5/2019
Doc Name Note
Part 1 of 3
Doc Name
Request for Technical Revision
From
Golder Associates, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR10
Email Name
AME
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> ' March 1,2019 18107649 <br /> ' A similar trend was observed for MW-4 following installation in 1999 and 2000 for constituents such as chloride <br /> and TDS. This stabilization process may indicate an initial influence of drilling water on water quality. <br /> The highest concentrations of barium are found in samples collected from the Group 3 wells (MW-4, MW-6 and <br /> ' MW-7). These wells are located greater than 500 feet from CKD disposal area A2. Group 2 wells (MW-2 and <br /> MW-3) are located less than 100 feet from the CKD disposal area A2 and have lower observed concentrations of <br /> barium. Likewise, observed TDS concentrations are higher in samples collected from the Group 3 wells than the <br /> Group 2 wells. This suggests barium and TDS concentrations reflect influence by native host materials rather than <br /> influence from CKD leachate. If the CKD deposited in area A2 was an ongoing source for barium and TDS loading <br /> ' to the groundwater, higher concentrations would be expected closer to CKD disposal area A2 in the Group 2 <br /> wells. This is particularly the case given that MW-2 and MW-3 are screened across the Niobrara/Codell contact; <br /> groundwater would be expected to flow along this contact in the Niobrara based on the understanding of Site <br /> ' hydrogeology(Secor 1998, Golder 2013, Golder 2014). Although TDS and barium concentrations in MW-4 <br /> increased during the 1998 and 1999 sampling, the concentrations have been stable since groundwater sampling <br /> resumed in 2010. <br /> ' 4.2 Groundwater Age Dating <br /> To assess the recharge age for the water monitored in the Site wells relative to CKD disposal, groundwater <br /> samples were collected on August 27, 2014 for tritium analysis from all of the Site wells except MW-5. Well MW-5 <br /> was not tested for tritium because of its proximity to a non-backfilled pit at the Site which likely acts as a localized <br /> recharge zone. Laboratory analysis for tritium was conducted by the Environmental Isotope Laboratory at the <br /> t University of Arizona. The laboratory results are presented in Appendix D. Appendix D includes results for <br /> "MW-20,"which was a blind duplicate for MW-6 submitted to the laboratory. <br /> Tritium (3H) is the radiogenic isotope of hydrogen and decays with a half-life of 12.23 years to helium <br /> (3 He). Tritium concentrations are measured in tritium units (TU), where 1 TU is equal to 1 tritium atom per 1018 <br /> hydrogen atoms. Although small amounts of tritium occur naturally through cosmic ray interactions with <br /> ' atmospheric gases, tritium was introduced to the environment in significant concentrations through nuclear <br /> weapons testing, which began in 1952. Tritium concentrations in precipitation prior to weapons testing are not <br /> well known but likely did not exceed 2 to 8 TU (Rupert and Plummer, 2004). Therefore, due to tritium decay, <br /> ' pre-1952 waters would currently have tritium concentrations near 0.4 TU (less than the 0.6 TU detection limit used <br /> in this study). <br /> ' Tritium concentrations in the atmosphere peaked in 1963 (Clark and Fritz, 1997). Since 1963, tritium <br /> concentrations in precipitation have decreased because of the discontinuation of weapons testing, exchange of <br /> water with the oceans, and the short half-life of tritium. Clark and Fritz (1997) presented a qualitative <br /> interpretation of tritium levels for continental regions (Table 10) as of 1997. <br /> The tritium value for modern (or current) precipitation and recharge is affected by many factors. The factors <br /> include time, costal proximity, seasonal variation and latitude. The time has affected levels of tritium in <br /> ' precipitation due to isotope decay and exchange of waters within the hydrologic cycle. The exchange of waters is <br /> more prevalent in coastal regions, so the levels of tritium in precipitation are lower near the oceans. Tritium <br /> concentrations in precipitation typically have strong seasonal variations; therefore, estimates of tritium in <br /> precipitation typically are not based on any one storm event but are often aggregate-based to account for <br /> seasonal and individual storm variation, all of which would contribute to groundwater. <br /> 1 <br /> ' J GOLDER 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.