Laserfiche WebLink
RECEIVED <br /> FEB 212019 <br /> D�MS1p�M pf, � February 10, 2019 <br /> A�IMUVG AMD�TEON <br /> Dear Elliot Russell, Michael Cunningham, & The DRMS: <br /> This is a response to the letter Atomic Perfection received from the DRMS office dated <br /> January 9, 2019. In your letter you stated that the Notice of Intent from Atomic Perfection that <br /> you received in your office on January 4th, 2019 has been denied_ Atomic Perfection would <br /> like to inform the DRMS that we still intend to start operations on the Henrietta Roy Lode (File <br /> P-2019-001) with an approved Notice of Intent from your office. Atomic Perfection states this <br /> decision contrary to your denial for the following reasons. As per common historical approach <br /> for such an operation Atomic Perfection acknowledges that obtaining an approved Notice of <br /> Intent to Conduct Prospecting Operations always precedes the approach to obtaining a <br /> Reclamation Permit as you are attempting to induce. Atomic Perfection would like to clarify <br /> that upon our proposed classification of technical mineral exploration by means of <br /> Prospecting is truly a synchronized initial step necessary before any Mining can commence. <br /> One should know that with such proposed activity legitimate Prospecting must take place in <br /> order to establish locations of mineral lodes and veins before more intensive Mining takes <br /> place. The act of mining can not commence until prospecting and exploration of deposits are <br /> established& located. Atomic Perfection believes that the proposed N.O.I. that your office has <br /> recently denied is not whatsoever outside nor contrary to definition or description of <br /> Prospecting for such an operation. Since Atomic Perfection has previously been approved <br /> from a virtually parallel N.O.L and there has been no changes in the law; we are confused as <br /> to why yourself& the office is denying the submitted N.O.I. for the Henrietta Roy. <br /> Atomic Perfection furthermore requests that your office describe the reason(s)you classify <br /> the proposed Henrietta Roy operation as mining rather than prospecting". In your <br /> explanation please clarify the criteria and technical reasons based for your decision stated <br /> denial of the N.O.I. Thus, in order for Atomic Perfection to have a accurate understanding of <br /> your decision and for potential modifications to the operation proposal or others in the future. <br /> Atomic Perfection appreciates your honest and forthright explanations to our requests. <br /> Additionally we request that you and the office allow a second review for approval of the <br /> current N.O.1 for the Henrietta Roy Claim_ We additionally request this based on the logical <br /> and verified points Atomic Perfection has stated_ Thank you for your time and looking forward <br /> to working together with your office as always. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Atomic Perfection - <br /> Mike Wild <br /> atomicge s@yahoo.c <br />