Laserfiche WebLink
! <br /> . ` \)u/C Creek Gn`J Pit ' Dcci,wo Notice and FONS 1 < i/|jXX> <br /> | <br /> Paze |O <br /> " <br /> � Chapter n[che EA}. The hng'/cnn hcneUciu| eA'ec|,; |o x/i|`. hn]no|ug) water and air <br /> quu|i(y' ncUunds. xquutic huN/au. regc!uJ{on, wildlife and scenic uSuurces will he <br /> potentially significant. <br /> | /\ rurc(y o[ noihguJion nquiccmcn(S for INS p ''cci Will m/urc [flat the proposed <br /> i <br /> improvements are implemented m u manner[flat will minimizropccuiun impacts. <br /> Monitoring /cquiomcn|S Will hedesi�ncd !u insure (hxi ||op irnprnrcmcn(su/c <br /> | effective and [unc{iouin , us intended Uo reduce erosion Lind sedimentation. <br /> -' <br /> This project will result in xi�ni[cun( improvements in the aesthetic characteristics o[(hc <br /> geographicxrcu` and will most likely induce Ourthorrcc!umuKion operations in the region. <br /> | The project will result in short hcnn inpuots. but the long term hcneDL; are substantial. <br /> The environmental effects are not scientifically ur technically controversial, dnnot <br /> | involve unique or unknown risks. nor Lire the environmental effects highly uncertain. <br /> Alternative[ does not establish u precedent for future actions with doniUcun( effects. nor <br /> | does it represent u decision ill principle about u future consideration. <br /> Implementing this u|i�rnuhv�. and oU�cr�x��in�orforeseeable actions on oradjacent to <br /> | the area, does not cause u significant cumulative effect. <br /> Based onu cultural resources inventory o[the site o[the proposed projeci conducted bv � <br /> | Powers Elevation Co . Inc. nnSeptember 1998. in compliance with the USDA pnosi <br /> | <br /> ' Service requirements regurdin� 3�cdnn |O0o�db���u1ionu\ BistohcPresor/u1ionAct, <br /> Alternative C would not affect any cultural resource on National Forest System land. <br /> | ABio|ogiou| Evaluation was completed in 1998 to assess the potential for impacts to | <br /> h:doruUy listed Threatened or Endangered species resulting from mining activities in the i <br /> ` proposed project. A list o[Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate species occurring on <br /> | the proposed project site was provided bvthn D.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ([DSFW3), i <br /> [o\ucudo D[vision.ofWi!dOife (CDOW), and Colorado Natural Bohtaqgo Prnorruno <br /> ( . The biological evaluation concluded that the proposed project wouNhuvono <br /> | adverse impacts on any Threatened, Endangered, Proposed or Forest Service Sensitive <br /> ' species, as disclosed in the biological evaluation. that may utilize the urouand that <br /> honefioiu| impacts may occur k> these species. <br /> This project doos not ibv:utcn to violate federal, state of- local law orrequirements <br /> | i. oo d for the protection of the environment. <br /> i <br /> ! <br /> � <br /> FOREST PLAN CONSISTENCY i <br /> | The management direction inthe Land and Resource Muxogen/xui Plan for dho Pike and ' <br /> San Isabel National Forests and the Comanche and Cimarron K[udonu| Grasslands (Forest i <br /> | <br /> Plan) establishes the guidelines |nho used for analyzing proyosa/yhv prospective Forest ! <br /> | users. All permits ror occupancy and use of National Forest lards covered by the Forest <br /> i <br /> Plan mug be consistent with its rnunuconnenidirccbon. The My|o Creek (]cuv� d | <br /> | ' ! P ' <br /> ! <br /> | <br /> � <br /> Hydrosphere Resource Consultants, 1002 Walnut suite 20o Boulder.cnomo � <br />