Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF SUMMARY FORM FOR CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS <br /> Date January 10, 2019 Operator Elk Creek Sand and Gravel, LLC <br /> Permit No. M-1978-208 Site Name Shaffers Crossing Quarry <br /> Specialist Eric Scott Objecting Part N/A <br /> Permit Type 110c Permit Acreage 9.90 <br /> Action: <br /> Permit Application with Objections <br /> Vio'.ation <br /> Extension of Board-Ordered Deadline <br /> X Other(specify): Permittee Request for Permit Reinstatement with Condition(s) <br /> Resolution: <br /> NATURE OF REQUEST.• <br /> This item is in regard to the operator's request for permit reinstatement. <br /> ST ATUT E: <br /> C.R.S. 34-32.5-124(6)(b) If the Board suspends or revokes the pen-nit of an operator, such operator may continue <br /> mining operations only for the purpose of bringing such operations into satisfactory compliance with the <br /> provisions of such operator's permit. Once such operations are completed to the satisfaction of the Board, the <br /> Board shall reinstate such permit. <br /> CHRONOLOGY.- <br /> November 14,2018 —The MLRB revoked permit M 1978-208 for failure to submit the required annual report, fee, <br /> and map (MV2018-039). <br /> DBMS notes, that since 2000, the operator has failed to comply with the requirement to submit the annual report, <br /> fee, and map seven times. In addition, Stipulation#2, imposed in 2007 with the approval of TR03, required that <br /> "the Operator will create a separate geotechnical section in each annual reclamation report describing rock <br /> discontinuities such as joints exposed by blasting and quarrying during the report year". <br /> November 21, 2018 —The operator submitted the annual fee, electronic report form, and map. The geotechnical <br /> information required by permit Stipulation#2, and the required $323 civil penalty for MV2018-039 were not <br /> provided. <br /> December 7, 2018 —The required $323 civil penalty for MV2018-039 was submitted to DBMS. <br /> December 14,2018 — DRMS received a request from the operator for a hearing to request pen-nit reinstatement, as <br /> well as an additional submittal to attempt to satisfy the requirements of Stipulation#2. After review by DRMS, <br /> the Stipulation#2 submittal was deemed inadequate as it did not address the condition or long term stability of the <br /> 13,3,S 5[ <-, 213, CO K-203, P 1-D3.N6.,.35b r m,n ',..sta'exo._:, <br />