My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-01-15_REVISION - M2018057 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2018057
>
2019-01-15_REVISION - M2018057 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2025 2:49:36 AM
Creation date
1/16/2019 12:31:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2018057
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/15/2019
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Venture Resources
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9. The Division has reviewed the reclamation cost estimate included in Attachment VI. <br /> The estimate did not include the mulching plan outlined in the reclamation plan, <br /> equipment mobilization and applicable indirect costs. The Division has conducted <br /> a reclamation cost estimate based on the proposed reclamation plan; it is enclosed <br /> for your review. Please indicate if the applicant concurs with the estimate. <br /> Response: <br /> We concur with the estimate. <br /> 10. Though not specifically stated on page 43 of the application, the Operator will be <br /> required to comply the time limits for reclamation required by Rule 3.1.3(2). <br /> Please affirm this is understood. <br /> Response: <br /> We understand that we must adhere to the time limits for reclamation laid out in Rule <br /> 3.1.3(2). However,we do not waive the provisions of CRS 34-32.5-112(6)which allow <br /> the Board, for good cause,to extend the period for site reclamation. <br /> 11. Section 3.1.11 indicates on page 52 that there are no building on site. Based on the <br /> pre-operation inspection and the El-a,d,f map there is a "Shaft Head Gear and Ore <br /> Bine" on site. Even though these structures are not part of the current operation, it <br /> would be good to note they currently exist on the site and that they will remain <br /> onsite at the conclusion of the operation. Please revise Section 3.1.11,page 52 <br /> accordingly. <br /> Response: <br /> Page 52 has been revised to read as follows: <br /> "The only structures within the proposed permit boundary are the very old Shaft Head Gear <br /> and Ore Bin. They will be left.No other structures are planned or will be left." <br /> 12. Under the notes section of the reclamation plan map(E-3), there is a note that says <br /> "No reclamation". It is unclear what this note is referring to. Please remove this <br /> citation on the map as there is not an area currently proposed that will not be <br /> reclaimed <br /> Response: <br /> The note on the Reclamation Plan Map"No Reclamation"refers only to the ephemeral <br /> creek bed. It is not meant to refer to any other area of the site. The map has been revised <br /> to clarify the note. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.