Laserfiche WebLink
1/16/2019 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail-Fwd:Colowyo ARR report form <br /> STATE OF DRMS_CoalAdmin -DNR, DNR<dnr drms_coal_admin@state.co.us> <br /> COLOR ADO <br /> Fwd: Colowyo ARR report form <br /> 1 message <br /> Trujillo- DNR, Zach <zach.trujillo@state.co.us> Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 6:56 AM <br /> To: DNR DRMS_CoalAdmin - DNR<dnr—drms—coal—admin@state.co.us> <br /> Correspondence from Kent Gorham to Division regarding ARR of Colowyo, c1981019. <br /> ---------- Forwarded message --------- <br /> From: KENT GORHAM <gorham18@com cast.net> <br /> Date: Tue, Jan 15, 2019, 4:50 PM <br /> Subject: Colowyo ARR report form <br /> To: <zach.trujillo@state.co.us> <br /> Hi Zach, <br /> Not sure if you are the lead on the Colowyo mine or not but if not, please forward to the <br /> appropriate party. <br /> As a result of researching reclamation issues, I have a question regarding the values reported on <br /> the latest Colowyo ARR report form (2017 and continuing back as far as 2013). <br /> Under the heading "for the entire life-of-mine, the total number of acres disturbed....". Why is this <br /> value reported exactly the same as the current number of disturbed (bonded) acres. Should this <br /> number not be the TOTAL number of acres that the mine disturbed over its entire life? As I always <br /> understood it, this value reports the cumulative total of ALL acres disturbed by the mine since <br /> inception, irrespective of bonded status. So, in my understanding, this value should be the current <br /> total of the disturbed (bonded) acres plus the Phase III released acres. <br /> I note that Trapper Mine reports their acres in the way I described. <br /> Please advise or correct my understanding. Expediency is not required. <br /> Thank you! <br /> Kent Gorham <br /> https://mail.google.com/mail/b/AN50xKl zNNV6MTt76n4hAhw84zwggcjGV56oxiimGdxyXOGNfiXs/u/O?ik=deb7fOcd20&view=pt&search=all&permthid... 1/2 <br />