Laserfiche WebLink
sequence through the permit term. <br />The cost estimate Rule 4(2)b is in progress at DRMS. As there may be some back and <br />forth regarding the Cost Estimate there may be additional adequacy questions <br />relating to the mining and regrade proposed. <br />DRMS notes that the cover letter submitted with the revised pages states that <br />Trapper is proposing to modify the shrub density standard to include a 700 <br />stems/acre alternative standard. <br />29. Please insert a discussion of this alternate standard on page 4-101 <br />where the success standards are outlined. <br />Trapper Response to Comment 29: Please refer to the Comment 10 response. <br />24 December DRMS: Trapper's response is adequate. <br />Rule: 2.05.4 (2) f(along with 4.05.8 4.11.4 and 4.14.3 and 2 - Reclamation <br />P Fan <br />24 December DRMS: Trapper's response is adequate. <br />No adequacy items. <br />Rule: 2.05.6 (3) (a), (b) Mitigation of Impacts <br />24 December DRMS: Please see adequacy item listed under Rule 2.04.7. <br />The additional pages have been reviewed and meet the rule requirements, no <br />additional adequacy items are requested at this time. <br />Trapper PR9 2"' Adequacy Prepared by: R. Reilley, LISP, M.S. Page 13 <br />Date: December 2018 <br />