My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-12-26_REVISION - M2008078 (28)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2008078
>
2018-12-26_REVISION - M2008078 (28)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2025 2:24:50 AM
Creation date
12/26/2018 3:22:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008078
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/26/2018
Doc Name Note
Preliminary - Part 4 of 4
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
J&T Consulting
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
study developed regional equations for Colorado including the Plains and <br /> incorporated basin area and the six-hour 100-year storm precipitation as shown in <br /> NOAA Atlas 2 (reference 17). The equation for one percent annual chance peak <br /> flow in the Plains region of Colorado is shown below. <br /> Q 100 =100 88 A0 63 6P 100298 <br /> Where, <br /> Q =peak flow, cfs <br /> A =drainage area, square miles (0.5<A<2,930) <br /> 6P100 = 6hr 100-year precipitation in inches, 5.1 inches at Holly (2.4<P<5.1) <br /> Flows on Willow Creek were calculated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br /> using a synthetic unit hydrograph that was developed from a flood event on Salt <br /> Draw near Orla, Texas. The flows were compared to a gage station analysis of <br /> the Arkansas River U.S.G.S. gage at Lamar. The Arkansas River at Lamar gage <br /> has a period of record of 1921 to the current year, with the data from 1944 to the <br /> current year reflecting the operation of John Markin Reservoir. The peak flows <br /> obtained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in their gage analysis, agreed with <br /> the unit hydrograph analysis. The study contractor checked this gage analysis by <br /> using Reference 18, and obtained peak flow rates within the 90 percent <br /> confidence limits of the frequency-discharge curve obtained in the "Review <br /> Survey for Water Resource Development, Lamar, Colorado, and Vicinity, <br /> Hydrology (Revised) 1978" (Reference 1). <br /> The peak discharges used in this study are shown in Table 1. <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.