Laserfiche WebLink
page three <br /> 28 November 2012 <br /> M12058MT <br /> entire mass is determined by summing the driving and summing the <br /> resisting forces acting on all slices and comparing these forces. <br /> Our slope stability analysis was performed using "Slope <br /> Stability Analysis" by Geosoft computer software. Our slope <br /> stability analysis considered one (1) assumed a typical cross <br /> section, as noted above, with a total of about 225 separate <br /> possible failure surface iterations to help identify the <br /> potential theoretical slope stability. Our discussions and data <br /> presentation are based only on the calculated critical circle <br /> which presented the lowest factor of safety against failure. Our <br /> presentation does not include the results of all of the itera- <br /> tions which resulted in a theoretical factor of safety greater <br /> than the lowest factor of safety and therefore were not critical. <br /> Our analysis was based on laboratory strength test results for <br /> the fill material. The soil strength values used in our analysis <br /> included: <br /> WE 10-40..12 16130 <br /> New Horizon Mine <br /> 240 10 most critical surfaces,MINIMUM BISHOP FOS= 1.531 <br /> 200 <br /> m 160 <br /> 1n <br /> x <br /> <120 <br /> 80 <br /> 40 <br /> 0 40 80 120 180 200 240 280 320 <br /> X—AXIS (feet) <br /> uthert mat Akeracizdez <br /> CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS <br /> AND MATERIAL TESTING <br /> Appendix 2.05.3(4)-6 Page 4 December 2018(TR-19) <br />