My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-12-21_REVISION - C2010089
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2018-12-21_REVISION - C2010089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 3:14:49 PM
Creation date
12/21/2018 3:10:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/21/2018
Doc Name
Application
From
Tr-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR19
Email Name
BFB
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Xmithert Cdr z <br /> CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS AND MATERIAL TESTING <br /> 7 January 2013 <br /> Western Fuels Association, Inc. <br /> 12050 North Pecos, Suite 100 <br /> Westminster, Colorado 80234 <br /> Attention: Mr. Douglas White,PE <br /> PN: M12058MT <br /> Subject: New Detention Pond Embankment <br /> North Plant Site <br /> Nucla, Colorado <br /> Comments Regarding DBMS Review <br /> Mr. White: <br /> This letter presents comments in response to your 27 December <br /> 2012 e-mail letter regarding the DBMS comments. The results of <br /> our analysis (rapid draw down condition) for the subject <br /> Detention Pond were presented in our letter dated 10 October <br /> 2012 . That submittal presented our analysis and included test <br /> results of embankment samples of the fill material for strength <br /> parameters. The calculated theoretical stability analysis used <br /> typical embankment cross section and parameters noted. <br /> Our report presented the results of the theoretical assessment <br /> of embankment stability during a rapid drawdown condition, which <br /> is the least stable embankment condition. This report presents <br /> the results for the theoretical calculated minimum factor of <br /> safety for a steady state seepage saturated embankment condition. <br /> This analysis used a unit moist weight of 122. 6 pcf for the <br /> embankment soil materials. The data from the actual field <br /> density tests indicate that the average moist compacted density <br /> was about 122. 6 pcf. <br /> The strength parameters used in our analysis which were derived <br /> from our direct shear strength tests are as follows: <br /> - laboratory moisture content-dry density relationship <br /> (Proctor) test, and <br /> - direct shear strength tests of remolded material. <br /> P.O.Box 3986 P.O.Box 45 <br /> Grand Junction,Co.81502 Montrose,Co. 81402 <br /> (970)245 6506 (970)249 2154 <br /> Appendix 2.05.3(4)-6 Page 7 December 2018(TR-19) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.