Laserfiche WebLink
1) review of predisturbance aerial photographs of the EC Mine area, 2) review of soils and topographic maps, and 3) <br />a site inspection to determine location of communities and the spatial relationship to disturbed areas. All of these <br />investigations used to compile the Vegetation Map (Map 20) were completed during the fall of 1980. <br />MethodoloQy <br />The following discussion describes the methodology used to collect the relevant baseline data and to allow the <br />statistical evaluation of the data. The basic intent of the data acquisition program was to insure that a random <br />sampling of the existing vegetation occurred. In addition to obtaining a random sample it was imperative that an <br />adequate sample was obtained to ensure that the mean and variance of the parameters being analyzed were <br />representative of the actual site conditions. <br />The field sample points were selected based upon a random number grid system. An adequate sample was assured by <br />applying the Sendecor-Cochran sample adequacy equation (1967) to the data obtained from the 20 preliminary <br />samples. The sample adequacy test was applied to each of the vegetation parameters being sampled to ensure <br />adequate sampling of the same. These parameters were; 1) herbaceous cover and production, and 2) woody species <br />density. The sample adequacy equation dictates that the mean be within 10 percent of the populations mean at the 80 <br />percent confidence level. The areas sampled for each community were equal to the area of the present disturbance. <br />Therefore, this will affect a 1:1 trade between currently disturbed and undisturbed land. A list of the disturbed areas <br />and acreage is given on Table 35, List of Disturbed Areas, Associated Acreage, and Representative Vegetation <br />Communities. <br />Cropland <br />For cropland areas production was the only parameter evaluated. This information was obtained from the farmers' <br />records for both the irrigated hay field and dryland wheat fields for five-(5) growing seasons. An average annual <br />production value for the five (5) year period will be calculated. <br />Saeebrush Communit <br />The pazameters sampled for the sagebrush community included; 1) herbaceous cover and production, and 2) woody <br />species density. <br />Herbaceous cover by species was used in the Shannon-Weiner index to calculate species diversity. Herbaceous cover <br />data was obtained by using the line intercept method. The utility of this method was discussed by Bonham, et. al. <br />(1980). In the line intercept method the portion of the line intercepted by the plant is recorded and summed over the <br />length of the line to find the cover value. This analysis was performed for each individual species intercepting the <br />line. The transect length was 15 meters long and, as described above, randomly located in the area to be sampled. <br />Special attention was paid in areas of species overlap to ensure that accurate cover data is obtained. <br />If selection of a starting point and the orientation of the line transect indicates that any overlap of two (2) or more <br />transects will occur then new starting points for orientation was randomly selected. Also, if any old roads are <br />traversed by the transect then the transect was interrupted where it crosses the road and started again on the opposite <br />side. The transect was stopped five (5) feet short of and restarted five (5) feet after the road to minimize variability <br />caused by the succession process occurring in the roads. This distance was selected after a visual inspection of the <br />sample sites. <br />Herbaceous production data was obtained by use of a clipped quarter meter squared quadrat. For clarity, the quadrat <br />will be Imxlm/4m. The ZO preliminary quadrats will be placed at the starting point of each of the line transects with <br />the long axis of the quadrat parallel to the line transect. The visually dominant herbaceous species was clipped by <br />Perini[ Renewal No. 4 2.04-30 Revised 3/5/03 <br />