Laserfiche WebLink
Negative Results Report <br />Cultural Resource Survey <br />Mountain Coal's Sunset Trail Lease Modifications Permit Revision #PR -15 <br />Gunnison County, Colorado <br />protected places but without associated architecture. Finally, lithic procurement areas must exhibit <br />primary or secondary lithic raw material available on-site, such as nodules eroding from bedrock, <br />lamellar bedrock, or as clasts found in a secondary context (such as alluvial cobbles) at a distance from <br />the primary source. A quarry must exhibit evidence for prehistoric excavation, evidenced by holes dug <br />to access geologic outcrops or gravel sources. <br />Prehistoric artifact terminology follows Adams (2002) for ground stone and Callahan (1979) and <br />Andrefsky (1998) for biface stage, which is determined by calculating width -to -thickness ratio. <br />Historic Period Sites <br />Historic period sites include homesteads, ranching, or agricultural complexes; mining complexes; sites <br />built under federal work programs; timber harvesting; and industry, among other site types. Age criteria <br />is established for potential historic sites by referencing general land office patents, county assessor <br />records, state water division records, historical maps, and 15' USGS maps. Historical dumps and artifact <br />scatters without features are evaluated on a case-by-case basis. A single artifact class within a dump, <br />such as sanitary cans, is recorded as an isolated occurrence; conversely, dumps that exhibit diverse <br />artifact classes and date prior to World War II may be documented as archaeological sites, given their <br />information potential. <br />Linear structures such as water conveyance systems, transmission lines, trails, and roads are <br />documented as sites. An isolated fence line is generally not recorded as a resource unless it demarcates <br />a boundary significant to the history of the area and can be physically linked with a purposeful activity; <br />an isolated fence line may also be documented as a feature of a larger resource. Depending on their <br />cultural context, single or small clusters of mining prospect pits with no associated artifacts are <br />documented as IFs due to their general ubiquity and limited information potential. <br />Criteria for Evaluation <br />Documented cultural resources are evaluated for their eligibility to be listed in the NRHP. NRHP <br />significance criteria are codified under 36 CFR 60.4, summarized below: <br />The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, and culture is present in <br />districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, <br />materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and <br />a) that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of <br />our history; or <br />b) that are associated with the lives of persons significant in the past; or <br />c) that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that <br />represents the work of a master, or that possess high artistic value, or that represent a significant <br />or distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or <br />d) that have yielded, or are likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. <br />ERO Project #10145 9 <br />EF. <br />