Laserfiche WebLink
' counties where the bulk of Colorado tourism dollars for skiing and outdoor <br /> ' activities flow. <br /> Economic losses to government include reductions in Empire property taxes <br /> ' compared to collections absent the DMRM. While gravel-pit property taxes and <br /> mineral rights will likely make up the difference, the expanded need for highway <br /> maintenance will increase costs substantially without a compensatory increase in <br /> ' highway tax revenue. Finally,the costs of damage to wildlife,water systems, and <br /> incomplete remediation will be bourn by CPW, federal government agencies, Clear <br /> Creek County and non-profit organizations. <br /> ' The only externality that can be assessed with some precision is the immediate <br /> certainty that property values located within three miles of the DMRM will decline. <br /> But there are ways to compensate the property owners affected. Either Clear Creek <br /> County could directly compensate owners upon the sale of their property or DMRM <br /> could provide a bond to do so. Some property owners, however,will feel that living <br /> ' next to a gravel pit reduces the amenities of living in Empire far beyond any <br /> compensation they would receive. <br /> ' While the risks of externalities to health, traffic congestion,wildlife and the <br /> environment cannot be estimated with precision,they are real and have potential <br /> negative outcomes that multiply with each contingency. The consequences of <br /> ' multiple sites of risk and vulnerability may well be costly for Colorado as a whole. If <br /> even one, let alone several negative outcomes occur, we will have failed our <br /> ' communities, our economy, and our environment. <br /> One example we do not want to follow is that of Cerrillos, New Mexico. In the mid- <br /> ' 1990s, a small gravel sifting operation located one mile north of Cerrillos was <br /> partnered with a larger gravel operator. 86 Soon heavy industrial traffic <br /> overwhelmed the peace and quiet of village life. The community opposed the <br /> expanded project indicating that it impinged on quality of life with four D's - dust, <br /> diesel, decibels and danger. Finally, county commissioners suspended the operation <br /> because it was discovered that the operator did not have the water rights required <br /> ' for the operation and that they had over mined the mine zone by at least 10 acres. <br /> It would be much easier not to permit the DMRM operation than to force Empire <br /> residents to fight its impact once the negative impacts became all too apparent. <br /> ' Gravel pit locations could be developed with fewer externalities if they were <br /> situated (i) away from small vulnerable communities, (ii) away from major <br /> ' interstate tourism routes, and (iii) away from Colorado's most vulnerable wildlife <br /> and water resources. At this point DMRM would be the only winner if the sand and <br /> gravel mine were approved. The losers would be Clear Creek residents,travellers <br /> ' on 1-70, CDOT, Colorado tourism, and Colorado wildlife and the environment. <br /> 86 http://www.raintreecounty.com/Recycle.html <br /> 32 <br /> 1 <br />