My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-12-12_REVISION - M2018016 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2018016
>
2018-12-12_REVISION - M2018016 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 7:10:03 AM
Creation date
12/12/2018 2:16:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2018016
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/12/2018
Doc Name Note
Impact Economic Assessment
Doc Name
Objection
From
Emily S. Andrews, Ph.D.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 66 <br /> residential and commercial property taxes. This may be the reason that some <br /> ' favor permitting the DMRM. <br /> Based on estimates provided in DMRM-July 2018, using Colorado Department of <br /> ' Revenue methodology, property taxes for the proposed sand and gravel pit are <br /> projected to come to $34,550 annually based on one-year production of one million <br /> tons of gravel (assuming current prices and expenses).67 While this is more than the <br /> ' value of lost property taxes from Empire, it represents a relatively small addition to <br /> tax revenue in comparison to other metrics. Consequently, we do not believe that a <br /> potential increase in tax revenue from the DMRM is worth the cost of the losses to <br /> ' Empire property owners. <br /> Why should we care? Empire property owners have become vulnerable because the <br /> ' negative shock to real estate investments from the proposed DMRM could not have <br /> been anticipated. Primary residences represent the largest asset most households <br /> own.68 In 2018, nearly two-thirds of Americans were homeowners. Even among <br /> ' families with less than the median income, over 50 percent owned their own homes. <br /> Empire is not a wealthy town. The median price of properties affected by the <br /> ' proposed gravel pit is only$214,000, compared to a median price for Clear Creek <br /> County of$297,000. Is it equitable for the residents of Empire to face losses due to <br /> ' the DMRM, while the pit operation itself is estimated to bring in $1.8 million <br /> annually from projected sales? <br /> ' One equitable policy to mitigate this vulnerability would be to have Clear Creek <br /> County compensate Empire residents for sales-price losses at the time of sale. <br /> Another avenue for remediation would be to have the DMRM establish an escrow <br /> ' fund for property-loss reimbursement. Of course, the surest way to avoid having <br /> vulnerable Empire property owners penalized for the negative externalities created <br /> by a mine operation would be to not approve the DMRM. <br /> ' Additional Costs of Traffic Congestion <br /> ' Additional road traffic is the normal result of the need to truck aggregates from <br /> mine to construction site. The DMRM's submitted documents anticipate 310 vehicle <br /> round-trips per day while the mine is in operation, of which 280 will be dump <br /> ' trucks picking up and carrying sand and gravel from the pit to a point at or near <br /> Denver. This represents a significant increase in traffic up and down the I-70 <br /> ' 66 Clear Creek Courant, October 17, 2018, p. 8. <br /> 67 Clear Creek County is also expected to gain revenue from mineral rights to the property, <br /> ' but this revenue has not been estimated to date in available documents. Certainly a fair <br /> decision of the economic consequences of permitting mining can only be made with full <br /> revenue coming to the county under consideration. <br /> ' 68 The study is based on the highly regarded Federal Reserve Board's 2016 Survey of <br /> Consumer Finances (SCF). <br /> 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.