My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-12-12_REVISION - M2018016 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2018016
>
2018-12-12_REVISION - M2018016 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 7:10:03 AM
Creation date
12/12/2018 2:16:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2018016
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/12/2018
Doc Name Note
Impact Economic Assessment
Doc Name
Objection
From
Emily S. Andrews, Ph.D.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' produced similar findings assessing reductions in property values for other <br /> P g g P P tY <br /> ' environmental disturbances. 59 <br /> All prospective gravel pit studies on changes in property values must use estimates <br /> based on prior research and apply those findings to the dis-amenity in question.60 <br /> Many studies of the impact of gravel pit operations on property prices, like this one, <br /> use the findings shown in Figure 1 below.61 Real-estate losses are highest for <br /> ' properties closest to the mine and are generally capped at three miles distance,the <br /> point at which the negative impact recedes.62 Research has shown that prices <br /> continue to stay lower than they would have been, at least until remediation is <br /> ' completed.63 <br /> In Empire, 166 properties are at risk of selling-price reductions, ranging from 4.9 <br /> percent to 35 percent depending on location. These 166 properties are currently <br /> valued by Clear Creek County at$35.5 million. With the DMRM gravel pit, the 166 <br /> properties would be worth $4.4 million less. Actual losses to Empire properties are <br /> ' likely to be greater,however, as property assessments are lower than selling <br /> prices.64 <br /> ' Real estate data for all Empire properties sold in 2017-2018, using actual sales <br /> prices, and properties currently on the market, based on best estimates by real <br /> ' estate agents, suggest that current market prices may be on average 65 percent <br /> higher than assessed prices. This would mean that the true loss to all property <br /> owners due to the proposed DMRM gravel mine would be $7.2 million. The likely <br /> tincluding distance to hazardous materials such as gravel pits,landfills,highways, railroad <br /> tracks,lead pollution, noxious industrial odors and similar dis-amenities. <br /> ' S9 For example,see Hite, Chen, Hitzhusen and Randall. <br /> https://papers.ssrn.com/soL3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=290926 <br /> 60 The first and most frequently cited case study of this type is by G. Erickcek,W.E. Upjohn <br /> Institute for Employment Research (2006), on the economic impact of a proposed gravel <br /> mine in Richland Township, Michigan <br /> https://research.upjohn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&https <br /> redir=1&article=1225&context=reports <br /> Also see: http_//www.petoskeygravelpit.com/. <br /> 61 Diane Hite, 2006. "Summary Analysis: Impact of Operational Gravel Pit on House Values, <br /> ' Delaware County, Ohio,"Auburn University. <br /> http://www.accpg.org/docs/Gravel%20Pit%20lnterim%20Zoning/Storey%20Pit/exhibit <br /> b.pdf <br /> ' 62 Approximate reductions in property values were calculated by distance from the <br /> proposed DMRM gravel pit using Google Maps software for groups of properties within <br /> three miles of Empire Junction Road. This leads to conservative property-value reductions, <br /> as this point is at the far edge of the gravel pit <br /> 63 Case Center for Spatial Economics. 2009. "The Potential Financial Impacts of the <br /> Proposed Rockford Quarry. <br /> ' http://wcwrpc.org/Financiallmpacts_RockfortQuarryCanada.pdf <br /> 64 With the exception of those properties that were updated based on recent sales. <br /> 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.