Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> PERMIT#:M-1983-119 , <br /> INSPECTOR'S INITIALS:AME <br /> INSPECTION DATE: October 10,2018 <br /> OBSERVATIONS <br /> This was a normal monitoring inspection of the Chivington Grazing site (Permit No. M-1983-119) conducted <br /> by Amy Eschberger of the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety(Division). Mr. Jack Howard <br /> represented the operator during the inspection. The site is located approximately 7.5 miles northwest of <br /> Chivington, Colorado in Kiowa County. Access to the site is from the west off Co Rd 49. Photos 1-10 taken <br /> during the inspection are included with this report. <br /> This is a 110c operation permitted for 9.7 acres to mine sand and gravel for use in county road construction and <br /> maintenance(see enclosed mining plan maps). No material processing occurs on site. Mined material is directly <br /> hauled off site for use or temporarily stored on the pit floor until needed. Pre-law mining disturbance exists just <br /> south and west of the permitted site. Portions of these areas are included in the approved permit area. The <br /> operator is not responsible for reclaiming pre-law disturbance located outside the approved permit area. The <br /> permit area includes the main access road, and forms a half circular shape north of the road. <br /> The approved post-mining land use for the site is rangeland. Reclamation of the site will include grading all <br /> disturbed slopes to 3H:1 V or flatter, replacing approximately 6 inches of topsoil on disturbed land, and seeding <br /> the land with a native grass seed mixture. The Division approved Technical Revision No. 1 (TR-1) in 2000, <br /> which allows the operator to import topsoil for reclamation if needed. <br /> A permit sign was posted at the main entrance to the site. The permit boundary was delineated with large rocks <br /> and an earthen ditch. The site was not active during the inspection, and appeared to have not been active for <br /> some time given the amount of volunteer vegetation covering the site. Mr. Howard informed the Division the <br /> material at the site is hard to use as a road base given the number of large rocks present in the material. <br /> Therefore, the operator is considering closing operations at this site and beginning final reclamation. <br /> Reclamation of the site should be fairly minimal, given that portions of the pit walls already have 3H:1 V or <br /> flatter slopes, and much of the site has good vegetative cover consisting of native grasses, forbs, and shrubs. <br /> The permit file indicates that approximately 2,000 cubic yards of topsoil was salvaged and stored on site for <br /> reclamation. The Division observed a few stockpiles on the pit floor that may be topsoil (difficult to determine <br /> due to vegetative cover). The material stockpiles present on the pit floor would need to be used for reclamation <br /> or removed from the site. The pit highwalls generally range from 10-20 feet in height. Northern and <br /> southeastern portions of the highwall have near vertical slopes and would require grading to 3H:IV. <br /> As discussed with Mr. Howard during the inspection, Rule 3.1.3 requires that all reclamation be carried to <br /> completion with all reasonable diligence, and each phase of reclamation be completed within five (5) years <br /> from the date the operator informs the Division that such phase has commenced. According to recent annual <br /> reports submitted by the operator, the site was last active in 2015. Therefore, unless mining activities <br /> recommence at the site, the operator should work to complete final reclamation by 2020. <br /> On the other hand, if the operation intends to recommence with mining activities at a later date, and therefore <br /> does not wish to begin final reclamation at this time, the operator may file a Notice of Temporary Cessation in <br /> accordance with Rule 1.13 (see enclosed). This would allow the operation to temporarily cease production of <br /> the mining operation for up to five years without being required to complete final reclamation. <br /> The operation appears to be following the approved mining plan. No problems were observed. <br /> This concludes the report. <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br />