My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-11-05_PERMIT FILE - C1981044 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2018-11-05_PERMIT FILE - C1981044 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2018 6:33:36 AM
Creation date
11/29/2018 11:07:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/5/2018
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 02 OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nettleton, Jerry <br />'rom: Reinhardt - CDPHE, Christopher <christopher.reinhardt@state.co.us> <br />ent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 6:12 AM <br />To: Nettleton, Jerry <br />Subject: Re: Moffat County Mining, LC - Williams Fork Mines Property <br />Jerry, <br />Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. As there does not seem to be a practical way in which to <br />maintain the records at the Williams Fork Mine Site, it is acceptable to the Division to maintain the records at <br />the offices at the Twentymile Mine Site provided that the records can be made available to the Division upon <br />request in a reasonable time frame. <br />Please let me know if you have any additional questions. <br />Thank you, <br />Chris <br />On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Nettleton, Jerry <JNettletonnr peabodyenerg> wrote: <br />Chris — <br />As you are aware, we recently cancelled the outdated air emission permits for our Williams Fork Property, and <br />replaced them with a General Land Development Emissions Permit (GP -03). In looking through the applicable <br />provisions of the General Permit, I note that it requires certain records to be maintain on site. All permit records <br />for the Williams Fork Property are currently maintained at our Twentymile Mine site (and the CDRMS Permit <br />sign at the mine entrance notes contact information) . Is this acceptable, given that we do not have an active <br />office facility at Williams Fork, or do we need to make some provision for retention of the required records at <br />the site?? Thanks for your attention and consideration — <br />Best regards, <br />Jerry <br />Jerry M. Nettleton <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.