My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-11-05_PERMIT FILE - C1981044 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2018-11-05_PERMIT FILE - C1981044 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2018 6:33:36 AM
Creation date
11/29/2018 11:07:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/5/2018
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 02 OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH <br />Water Quality Control Division <br />Rationale - Page 9 <br />Permit No. CO -0034142 <br />APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS: <br />pH: (Continued) <br />The second part of the mixed pH determination is to find the total <br />carbonate carbon of the mix from a graph relating total alkalinity, pH, <br />and total carbonate carbon was read from this graph for the respective <br />upstream pH (8.4 s.u.) and alkalinity, and the maximum assumed effluent <br />pH (9.7 s.u.) and alkalinity values. After determination of the upstream <br />and effluent discharge total carbonate values, the following mass balance <br />equation was used to determine the total carbonate carbon value of the <br />mixture: <br />(CTu)(Qu) + (CTd)(Qd) - CT mix <br />Qu + Qd <br />The final portion of determining the pH mixture value is by using the <br />above discussed graph, and finding the pH mix from total alkalinity mix <br />• and total carbonate carbon mix values. In all cases (i.e., with the <br />upstream alkalinity value of 70.3 mg/l as CaCO3), and with both assumed <br />WWTF alkalinity values of 500 and 700 mg/l as CaC031 the pH mixture was <br />below 9.0 s.u., somewhere in the range of 8.2-8.5 s.u. Thus this <br />indicates that the stream pH value is not affected by the facility's <br />discharge pH contribution, since 8.42 was the median upstream pH value. <br />Thus, an effluent limitation for pH of 6.0 to 9.7 s.u. can be assigned <br />while still maintaining stream standards. <br />Effluent pH limitations of 6.0 to 9.7 s.u. will thus allow protection of <br />the existing uses of the Williams Fork River. Since no chemical <br />treatment processes are employed for this domestic facility (chlorination <br />is excluded from this category), a deviation from the secondary treatment <br />standards of 6.0 to 9.0 s.u. for pH is allowable, provided that the water <br />quality standards are not violated. <br />(This rationale was drafted by Don Holmer in late 1983 and 1984). <br />References <br />1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1982. <br />Wasteload Allocation Draft Guidance on Performing Ammonia Toxicity <br />Analyses. <br />Washington, D.C. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.