Laserfiche WebLink
The source of inflows to date is believed to be a mix of water infiltrating the graben <br />along the faults and water in the coal seam. The mine was largely idle between 1992 and 1999; <br />operations resumed in early 2000. As projected, additional mine inflows have been encountered <br />since operations resumed, as the workings have extended further to the east into the predicted <br />saturated portion of the Cameo seam. In April 2000, seepage was observed in the mining faces <br />developing to the east. Current estimated inflow rate as documented in the 2005 Annual Hydrologic <br />Report (AHR) is approximately 31.4 gpm, which is in line with PHC projections indicated in <br />Appendix N of the application (30 gpm inflow predicted for 0.5 million ton per year production rate. <br />This does not include the inflows into sealed portions of the mine north of the East Mains discussed <br />in the previous paragraph. The inflow water is collected in mine sumps and used for dust control in <br />the mining process and for haul road dust control. Initially following resumption of operations in <br />2000, inflows were entirely consumed by dust control operations, but beginning in May 2002, <br />discharge via CDPS Outfall 002 was resumed. For the purposes of projecting the effect mine <br />discharge will have on East Salt Creek, PHC projections in Appendix N have assumed a conservative <br />maximum mine flow rate of 100 gpm, or 0.22 CFS. <br />The quantity of inflows which have been observed to date and are projected upon <br />resumption of mining in future permit terms are considered to be insignificant with respect to effects <br />on flow in the ephemeral surface drainages, or with respect to recharge of the coal seam. Based on <br />information provided in the permit application, ground water intercepted by the mine does not appear <br />to be in communication with any aquifers being put to beneficial use, and there are no registered <br />wells within two miles of the permit boundary. <br />The quality of water discharged from the mine is similar to, or of higher quality, than <br />water in East Salt Creek at the confluence with McClane Creek, and any discharge is required to <br />meet NPDES discharge standards. For these reasons, no detrimental impact to ground water <br />resources or to surface water quality downstream of the permit area is expected. Original ground <br />water flow patterns in the mined area will ultimately be reestablished after the mine is sealed and the <br />abandoned workings slowly fill with water. <br />An alluvial aquifer has been identified along East Salt Creek. Monitoring wells <br />established in the alluvium indicate that alluvial water levels fluctuate seasonally in response to flow <br />in East Salt Creek. Data collected by the applicant from the Salt Creek alluvial aquifer indicate a <br />carbonate -sulfate type water, similar to the characteristics of the surface water in the system as would <br />be expected. No effects to alluvial ground water quality or quantity are anticipated. <br />Surface Water Effects <br />McClane Canyon is an ephemeral drainage which is normally dry. Flows that do occur <br />are in response to snowmelt or intense rainstorms, and are usually of short duration. McClane <br />Canyon drainage is tributary to East Salt Creek, which is an intermittent tributary of the Colorado <br />River. Water quality is typical of and climate, with ephemeral and intermittent systems located in <br />marine deposited sedimentary land forms. Dissolved constituents often reach very high levels <br />following dry periods and during the winter, when stream flows are made up almost entirely of <br />recharge from ground water and from stagnant or semi -stagnant pools. Suspended solids levels are <br />high during spring runoff and following high intensity rainstorms, due to sparse vegetation and <br />erodible soils. <br />Due to the limited areal extent of surface disturbance, existence of effective sediment <br />control measures, and small quantity and acceptable quality of projected minewater discharge, <br />operations at McClane Canyon have had little effect on the quality of water in McClane Canyon <br />