Laserfiche WebLink
that reside in the river (Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub, razorback sucker, and bonytail). In <br />a memorandum dated June 16, 2006 "Comments on the Biological Assessment for McClave Canyon <br />Mine, Permit No. C-1980-004, and Munger Canyon Mine, Permit C-81-020", USFWS indicated <br />concurrence with the OSM Biological Assessment regarding potential impacts to the Mexican <br />spotted owl, Canada lynx, Uinta Basin hookless cactus, DeBeque phacelia, and Parachute penstemon <br />("no effect"). USFWS also indicated concurrence with the OSM Biological Assessment <br />determination for the bald eagle and yellow -billed cuckoo ("may affect, but not likely to adversely <br />affect"). <br />Regarding the endangered fish species of the upper Colorado River, USFWS noted that, while <br />they consider any water depletions from the Upper Colorado River Basin to adversely affect the <br />endangered fishes and their habitats, they concluded that "the existing Recovery Implementation <br />Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin will continue to serve as <br />the reasonable and prudent alternative to avoid jeopardy to the endangered fishes by the project - <br />caused depletions". The USFWS determination was based on information provided in the <br />application indicating that the proposed operations would not result in any increase in the estimated <br />net annual water depletion to the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br />USFWS had raised concerns regarding potential impacts of water depletion associated with <br />the operation on endangered fish species of the Colorado River during previous permitting actions. <br />In 1992, USFWS determined that the project was not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of <br />the endangered fishes if the company made a contribution to the Recovery Implementation Program <br />for Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin. The operator made the recommended <br />onetime payment of $41.93 ($11.98 per acre foot of projected annual depletion) on November 16, <br />1992. In a letter of January 11, 2000 from Richard P. Krueger of the USFWS to Sandy Vana-Miller <br />of OSM, USFWS clarified that, pursuant to a 1997 USFWS biological opinion, depletion fees are <br />no longer required for annual depletions of 100 acre feet or less (see Appendix P of the approved <br />permit application). Based on a revised water consumption estimate of January 24, 2002, prepared <br />in association with TR -11 and RN -05 (Appendix P), it was determined that the McClane Canyon <br />operation would result in a maximum water loss of 13.39 acre feet per year, at a projected coal <br />production level of 1,700,000 tons per year (which is more than triple the projected maximum annual <br />production during the RN -06 permit term). Because the projected annual depletion is less than 100 <br />acre feet, the referenced depletion fee waiver remains applicable. <br />16. The Division has contacted the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation Fees Branch. As of <br />this time, McClane Canyon Mining, LLC, the operator is current in the payment of reclamation <br />fees required by 30 CFR Chapter VII, subchapter R (2.07.6(2)(0)). <br />Section B - Rule 4 <br />Roads - Rule 4.03 <br />Road design and construction narrative is found in Section 2.2.2 of the permit application <br />package (PAP). Road reclamation is discussed in Section 3 of the PAP. Road plan and profile maps, <br />and cross sections are provided on Exhibits 2.2-4 and 2.2-5. Permitted roads are an existing <br />access/haul road extending from State Highway 139 to the portal facilities area which was <br />constructed in the spring of 1977, and light use roads in the sediment pond/soil stockpiles vicinity. <br />The operator has committed to reclaim all roads to approximate original contour (AOC), <br />with no road segments to be retained for the post mining land use. <br />