My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-11-26_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2018-11-26_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2018 10:29:20 AM
Creation date
11/27/2018 11:24:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/26/2018
Doc Name Note
For RN8
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
McClane Canyon Mining, LLC
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
CCW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that reside in the river (Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub, razorback sucker, and bonytail). In <br />a memorandum dated June 16, 2006 "Comments on the Biological Assessment for McClave Canyon <br />Mine, Permit No. C-1980-004, and Munger Canyon Mine, Permit C-81-020", USFWS indicated <br />concurrence with the OSM Biological Assessment regarding potential impacts to the Mexican <br />spotted owl, Canada lynx, Uinta Basin hookless cactus, DeBeque phacelia, and Parachute penstemon <br />("no effect"). USFWS also indicated concurrence with the OSM Biological Assessment <br />determination for the bald eagle and yellow -billed cuckoo ("may affect, but not likely to adversely <br />affect"). <br />Regarding the endangered fish species of the upper Colorado River, USFWS noted that, while <br />they consider any water depletions from the Upper Colorado River Basin to adversely affect the <br />endangered fishes and their habitats, they concluded that "the existing Recovery Implementation <br />Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin will continue to serve as <br />the reasonable and prudent alternative to avoid jeopardy to the endangered fishes by the project - <br />caused depletions". The USFWS determination was based on information provided in the <br />application indicating that the proposed operations would not result in any increase in the estimated <br />net annual water depletion to the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br />USFWS had raised concerns regarding potential impacts of water depletion associated with <br />the operation on endangered fish species of the Colorado River during previous permitting actions. <br />In 1992, USFWS determined that the project was not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of <br />the endangered fishes if the company made a contribution to the Recovery Implementation Program <br />for Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin. The operator made the recommended <br />onetime payment of $41.93 ($11.98 per acre foot of projected annual depletion) on November 16, <br />1992. In a letter of January 11, 2000 from Richard P. Krueger of the USFWS to Sandy Vana-Miller <br />of OSM, USFWS clarified that, pursuant to a 1997 USFWS biological opinion, depletion fees are <br />no longer required for annual depletions of 100 acre feet or less (see Appendix P of the approved <br />permit application). Based on a revised water consumption estimate of January 24, 2002, prepared <br />in association with TR -11 and RN -05 (Appendix P), it was determined that the McClane Canyon <br />operation would result in a maximum water loss of 13.39 acre feet per year, at a projected coal <br />production level of 1,700,000 tons per year (which is more than triple the projected maximum annual <br />production during the RN -06 permit term). Because the projected annual depletion is less than 100 <br />acre feet, the referenced depletion fee waiver remains applicable. <br />16. The Division has contacted the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation Fees Branch. As of <br />this time, McClane Canyon Mining, LLC, the operator is current in the payment of reclamation <br />fees required by 30 CFR Chapter VII, subchapter R (2.07.6(2)(0)). <br />Section B - Rule 4 <br />Roads - Rule 4.03 <br />Road design and construction narrative is found in Section 2.2.2 of the permit application <br />package (PAP). Road reclamation is discussed in Section 3 of the PAP. Road plan and profile maps, <br />and cross sections are provided on Exhibits 2.2-4 and 2.2-5. Permitted roads are an existing <br />access/haul road extending from State Highway 139 to the portal facilities area which was <br />constructed in the spring of 1977, and light use roads in the sediment pond/soil stockpiles vicinity. <br />The operator has committed to reclaim all roads to approximate original contour (AOC), <br />with no road segments to be retained for the post mining land use. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.