Laserfiche WebLink
a � <br /> OL TETRA TECH Updated Tucson South Proposed Gravel Mine Slope Stability Analysis <br /> ■ti November 9, 2018 <br /> Groundwater was encountered while drilling in 2004 at depths between eight and 12 feet below the ground <br /> surface. Monitoring well readings from December 2003 to August 2004 have water levels between four and 16 <br /> feet below ground surface. <br /> 3.0 PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS <br /> A similar evaluation was completed for the Tucson South mine in November 20043. The evaluation used the <br /> (previously required)factor of safety value of 1.0 and analyzed a total of 14 critical structures surrounding the <br /> Tucson South Resource footprint. No seismic analysis was conducted. A mud lens was modeled in each section. <br /> The analysis found that several of the minimum mining setbacks needed to be increased to meet the minimum <br /> required factor of safety of 1.0. The previous evaluation was used as a basis for this evaluation. <br /> 4.0 STABILITY ANALYSIS <br /> The stability analysis was conducted using GeoStudio 2012 (Slope/W Define) computer software4. The software <br /> is capable of computing factors of safety for a range of materials using finite element analysis. Spencer's method <br /> of slices5 was used to calculate the safety factor for the individual failure surfaces. <br /> Several assumptions were made for the models including: <br /> • Surficial geology was modeled based on stability models and borehole data from 2004. <br /> • Geologic layers are horizontal in the subsurface. <br /> • The West and East pits will be mined after the slurry wall is installed and will be dewatered as needed. <br /> • The slurry wall will be built around the perimeter of the East and West Pits, crossing Tucson Street on the <br /> north and south ends. No slurry wall will divide the East and West Pits. <br /> • The slurry wall will be keyed six feet into bedrock. <br /> • No significant berms of stockpiled materials would be placed on the surface. <br /> 4.1 ANALYZED SECTIONS <br /> Critical structures within 200 feet of proposed disturbance were modeled. A critical structure is defined by the <br /> DRMS as a structure that poses a potential human safety risk, major environmental impact, and major repair cost <br /> if the slope were to fail'. No critical structures were analyzed for the Southwest Pit since the pit will be mined via <br /> wet mining and the slopes will not be vertical. Also, contrary to the previous stability modeling effort, a mud lens <br /> was not modeled in each section. Seven critical structures were identified within 200 feet of the proposed Tucson <br /> South, East, and West Pit mine boundaries: <br /> • Tucson St. <br /> • Colorado Highway 7 (E 160'h Avenue) <br /> • Power poles to the west of the proposed West Pit boundary <br /> • South Platte River <br /> • Gas well to the west of the proposed West Pit boundary <br /> • Pipeline north of the proposed mine boundary <br /> • Brighton Ditch <br /> 3 Goss, C. (2004, November 22). RE: Revised Tucson South Proposed Gravel Mine Slope Stability Analysis; <br /> Tetra Tech RMC Job No. 19-3919.019.00. (T. M. Refer, Ed.) Longmont, CO: Tetra Tech. <br /> 4 GEO-SLOPE International, Ltd. (2014). SLOPE/W 2012. December 2014 Release. <br /> 5 Spencer, E., 1967. A Method of Analysis of the Stability of Embankments Assuming Parallel Inter-Slice Forces." <br /> Geotechnique, Vol. XVII, No. 1, pp. 11-26. <br /> Page 215 <br />