Laserfiche WebLink
NEWMON '`"' NewmontMining Corporation <br /> Cripple Creek&Victot Mine <br /> 100N`c','St <br /> P n Box 191 ���� <br /> ViCtor, CO 80860 <br /> www newmont c,om <br /> NOV 1,9 2018 <br /> SENT CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 041WH OF <br /> 7018 0680 0000 4627 6108 <br /> November 14, 2018 <br /> —f Mr. Timothy Cazier, P.E. <br /> Environmental Protection Specialist <br /> Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br /> Division of Reclamation,Mining and Safety <br /> Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br /> 1313 Sherman Street,Room 215 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> Re: Permit No. M-1980-244; Cripple Creek& Victor Gold Mining Company; Cresson Project; <br /> TR 107—Arequa Gulch Phase II Solution Flow Modification Preliminary Adequacy Review <br /> Response <br /> Dear Mr. Cazier: <br /> On October 26, 2018, Newmont Mining Corporation's Cripple Creek and Victor Gold Mining Company <br /> (CCV) received the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (DRMS) preliminary adequacy review <br /> of Technical Revision(TR)No.107. Below are DRMS's comments in italics followed by CCV's response <br /> in bold. <br /> 1. Fes: The provided figures (with the exception of Figure 4) have very small font and are more <br /> or less landscape format, but printed as portrait format. These figures are part of the public <br /> record and need to be reasonably legible. Simply switching the orientation of these figures from <br /> portrait to landscape might be sufficient. Also, note maps (Figures 3, 5, and 7) require: an <br /> acceptable map scale not larger than 1 inch = 50 feet nor smaller than I inch = 660 feet; a scale; <br /> appropriate legend; map title; date and north arrow pursuant to Rule 6.2.1(2)(e) and C.R.S. 34- <br /> 32-112(4)(d). Please provide revised figures. <br /> All figures have been updated as required and are included in this submission. <br /> 2. Slaked lime: Modification #2 discusses transporting lime%re from the existing Process Solution <br /> Enhancement System (PSES) stabilization tank to both the valley leach facilities (VLFs). The <br /> Division has the following questions and concerns: <br />