My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-11-15_REVISION - M1978332
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1978332
>
2018-11-15_REVISION - M1978332
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 3:30:01 AM
Creation date
11/15/2018 4:03:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978332
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/15/2018
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #3
From
Greg Lewicki & Assoc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM2
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Greg Lewicki And Associates, PLLC <br /> 3375 NN. Poncrs Circle Phunc: (720)842-5321 Fax (303)346-6934 <br /> Littleton.C O 80123 L-mail: inf'o,a leiNicki.bii <br /> I�E6Ei�Eq <br /> November 13, 2018 NOV 15 2018 <br /> Jared Ebert DIVISION OF RECLAMATION <br /> Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety MINING AND SAFETY <br /> 1313 Sherman St, Room 215 <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> RE: Colorado Rose Red Stone Resource, M-2013-068,AM-02 Adequacy Response 3 <br /> Jared: <br /> Please allow the following Adequacy Response 3 to satisfy your Adequacy Review No. 3 dated <br /> June 18, 2018. Previous Adequacy Responses were generated by Environment, Inc. and will be <br /> answered by Lewicki and Associates, PLLC now and in the future. The items listed below <br /> reflect the original adequacy items followed by the most recent Division response detailed in the <br /> June 18, 2018 Adequacy Review No. 3. Adequacy Response 3 information follows the most <br /> recent DRMS review comments. <br /> Adequacy Review No. 1 —Items identified in the DRMS letter dated January 8, 2018. <br /> Rule 6.3.4 Exhibit D—Reclamation Plan <br /> 8. The Applicant's plan to close the mine openings using welded rebar cemented into place <br /> is not consistent with the standard adit closure practices. The Division recommends <br /> installing a grated adit closure with doors to allow the landowner access or a wire rope <br /> netting closure. Details regarding the specifications, materials required and the execution <br /> of these types of closures are available on the Division's website: (DRMS link, not <br /> included here). This document is the General Bid Specifications guide that our Inactive <br /> Mine Program uses as a standard for mine closures similar to this. The Division would <br /> accept a plan for closure of the mine openings consistent with these standard practices. <br /> a. DRMS Response 3: Please clarify, is the applicant proposing a different closure <br /> method than that was originally proposed with the AM02 submittal? If a closure <br /> method is selected from the IMP guide, please indicate which closure method will <br /> be used. <br /> b. GLA Response 3: The Operator wishes to utilize the `Adit backfilling—Rockfill' <br /> method as defined on page 36/132 on the DRMS General Bid Specification guide <br /> detailed in your Adequacy Review dated June 18, 2018. Furthermore, the Rose <br /> Red Quarry wishes to remove the eastern most adit from their mine plan and will <br /> now and in the future operate using the two adits currently in place— Room 41 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.