My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-11-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2018-11-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2018 10:35:20 AM
Creation date
11/9/2018 10:34:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/5/2018
Doc Name Note
For RN7
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Moffat County Mining, LLC
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
RAR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Williams Fork Mines Prepared by: R. Reilley M.S. GISP <br />C1981044 5 November 2018 <br /> <br /> <br /> 8 <br />source of alluvial material. Ground water from the Yampa River alluvium is primarily sodium sulfate type. <br />Dissolved solids average 4,586 mg/l with a maximum measure of 8,810 mg/l. Ground water for the Williams <br />Fork alluvium is primarily of the sodium bicarbonate type. Total dissolved solids average 1,009 milligrams per <br />liter (mg/l) with a maximum measured value of 1,510 mg/l. Maximum primary and secondary drinking water <br />standards are exceeded in both aquifers for many parameters including barium, cadmium, chloride, chromium, <br />pH, sulfate, and selenium. In addition, average concentration values for chloride, total dissolved solids, iron, <br />lead, manganese, and sulfate exceed EPA primary and secondary standards. <br /> <br />Natural Springs and Seeps. There are six springs within the permit area and adjacent areas. The North Spring, <br />also referred to as the Lippard No. 1, originates at the head of a small drainage near its junction with old <br />Highway 13 along the base of a thin Pleistocene or Quaternary gravel that caps many terraces in the area. The <br />East Spring flows from the base of a highway fill and appears to be a man-made situation. The South Spring is <br />located on a hillside west of the Williams Fork River approximately one mile south of the No. 5 Mine portal <br />where water discharges from a sandstone lens within the Iles Formation. A small seep is found at the No. 9 <br />Mine face-up. This spring flows only in the spring and dries up in the summer. The Haxton Spring originates <br />in a weathered, brown-gray, very fine-grained sandstone. A pipe has been set in the ground at the spring, but <br />no flow has been observed. Aggregate flow from the springs is less than 20 gpm. The springs that were <br />surveyed do not appear to be discharge zones for any of the regional bedrock aquifers and are not considered <br />significant water sources. <br /> <br />Spoil Springs. Water seeps from the base of the old Williams Fork Strip Pit No. 1 and drains into the Williams <br />Fork River. Presumably the water percolates through the regraded spoils of the pit. Flow has ranged between <br />4 gpm and 198 gpm. Total dissolved solids have averaged around 1,000 mg/l. <br /> <br />Soil Types. The permit area is occupied by three soil orders: Aridisols, Entisols, and Mollisols. These soil <br />orders are characteristic of fairly steep, semi-arid regions of northwestern Colorado. They represent soils that <br />grade from recently developed soil bodies with minimum horizon development (Entisols) to older soils with <br />well-defined diagnostic horizons (Mollisols). <br /> <br />Soil Characteristics and Distribution. Overall, the soils found in the proposed permit area are relatively deep <br />and fairly well-drained. Effective rooting depth varies from two to sixty inches within the area. The deepest <br />soils yielding the greatest rooting depths occur in valleys and on the leeward sides of ridges. Soil reaction is <br />slightly acid to moderately alkaline in the permit area with the exception of small scattered areas where <br />substrata are saline. These small areas have probably formed in place from weathered sodic shales. <br /> <br />Vegetation Communities. Vegetation communities in the permit area range from an upland mountain shrub <br />community to cottonwood-willow communities in the riparian zone next to the Williams Fork and Yampa <br />Rivers. Juniper or big sagebrush communities dominate more xeric sites throughout the permit area. Lands <br />disturbed by mining are upland big sagebrush and mountain shrub communities, croplands, and previously <br />mined lands. The croplands are previously mined lands. There are two types of croplands: 1) irrigated <br />hayfields in the fertile river bottom areas, and 2) dryland wheat, found on cleared hillsides which were once <br />sage-dominated. Several areas disturbed by former mining operations are within the disturbed areas. <br /> <br />Wildlife. Wildlife habitat in the permit area is diverse. It is used extensively by mule deer, elk and pronghorn <br />antelope. Known predators include badger, cougar, coyote, red fox and bobcat. Small game and furbearing <br />mammals include the cottontail rabbit, white tailed jackrabbit, raccoon, beaver, muskrat, striped skunk and <br />weasel. Many species of birds are also found within the permit boundary. Of special interest are various <br />species of waterfowl, raptors (including the golden and bald eagles), the sandhill crane, Columbian sharptail <br />grouse and the Greater sage grouse. Fish species in the Williams Fork River, within the affected area, include
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.