Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Williams Fork Mines Prepared by: R. Reilley M.S. GISP <br />C1981044 5 November 2018 <br /> <br /> <br /> 25 <br />Compliance with the Basic Standards for Ground Water <br />(Regulation 41 of the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission) <br /> <br />Section 4.05.13(1) of the Regulations requires the establishment of one or more ground water <br />points of compliance (wells) for an operation which has the potential to negatively impact the <br />quality of ground water. The mine monitors the Middle Sandstone in well TR-7a and the <br />Williams Fork alluvium in well AVF-5. The TR-7a well is within the expected bedrock <br />flowpath of mine leachate, should the mine discharge leachate to bedrock units. The AVF-5 well <br />is within the expected alluvial flowpath of leachate, should the mine discharge leachate to <br />Williams Fork River alluvium. AVF-5 is also within the expected flow path of pumped mine <br />water, should mine water adversely impact the alluvial water. Both wells meet the qualifications <br />of a compliance point, as those qualifications are listed in Section 4.05.13(1)(b). Monitoring <br />data from both wells indicate the mine has not caused an exceedance of the Basic Standards for <br />Ground Water with the exception of Manganese levels in AVF-5 which is often above the Basic <br />Standards for Groundwater drinking limit. However, according to section 2.04.7 of the permit, <br />dissolved solids, iron, lead, manganese and sulfate often exceed the drinking water standards <br />naturally. <br /> <br />Observed Surface Water Impacts <br /> <br />Discharges from the 5 and 6 Mines have not caused measurable depletion of stream flows in the <br />mine vicinity. If all of the mine inflows during active mining (approximately 2 cfs) came from <br />the Williams Fork and Yampa Rivers, it would be too small of a depletion to detect in those <br />rivers’ 7-day/10-year low flows. Monitoring data in the annual hydrology reports from 1981 <br />through 2017 indicate the Williams Fork Mines have not significantly impacted the water quality <br />of the Williams Fork River. <br /> <br />G. No surface water is proposed to be discharged into, or directed into, underground mine <br />workings. <br /> <br />H. MCM does not plan to convert any monitoring wells to water supply wells. <br /> <br /> <br />I. Stream Buffer Zones - Rule 4.05.18 <br /> <br />The Williams Fork Mines included several structures located within 100 feet of the perennial <br />Williams Fork River. These structures consisted of a coal storage silo (demolished in 2018), a <br />48-inch cross country conveyor (demolished in 2017), waste water ponds, No. 5 Mine <br />dewatering wells and associated substation and access road, haul road bridge, well 259 and pond <br />HR-P1, and rail road at tail track end (demolished in 2017). The conveyor was an enclosed <br />structure as it crossed the river and the highway, therefore minimizing disturbance to the stream. <br />The coal storage silo was a concrete structure utilized to load railroad cars. These variances <br />from the 100-foot buffer zone for perennial streams have been granted by the Division upon <br />finding: 1) that the original stream channel will be restored; 2) during and after mining, the <br />water quantity and quality from the stream section from within 100 feet of the surface coal