My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-11-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2018-11-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2018 10:35:20 AM
Creation date
11/9/2018 10:34:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/5/2018
Doc Name Note
For RN7
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Moffat County Mining, LLC
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
RAR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Williams Fork Mines Prepared by: R. Reilley M.S. GISP <br />C1981044 5 November 2018 <br /> <br /> <br /> 25 <br />Compliance with the Basic Standards for Ground Water <br />(Regulation 41 of the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission) <br /> <br />Section 4.05.13(1) of the Regulations requires the establishment of one or more ground water <br />points of compliance (wells) for an operation which has the potential to negatively impact the <br />quality of ground water. The mine monitors the Middle Sandstone in well TR-7a and the <br />Williams Fork alluvium in well AVF-5. The TR-7a well is within the expected bedrock <br />flowpath of mine leachate, should the mine discharge leachate to bedrock units. The AVF-5 well <br />is within the expected alluvial flowpath of leachate, should the mine discharge leachate to <br />Williams Fork River alluvium. AVF-5 is also within the expected flow path of pumped mine <br />water, should mine water adversely impact the alluvial water. Both wells meet the qualifications <br />of a compliance point, as those qualifications are listed in Section 4.05.13(1)(b). Monitoring <br />data from both wells indicate the mine has not caused an exceedance of the Basic Standards for <br />Ground Water with the exception of Manganese levels in AVF-5 which is often above the Basic <br />Standards for Groundwater drinking limit. However, according to section 2.04.7 of the permit, <br />dissolved solids, iron, lead, manganese and sulfate often exceed the drinking water standards <br />naturally. <br /> <br />Observed Surface Water Impacts <br /> <br />Discharges from the 5 and 6 Mines have not caused measurable depletion of stream flows in the <br />mine vicinity. If all of the mine inflows during active mining (approximately 2 cfs) came from <br />the Williams Fork and Yampa Rivers, it would be too small of a depletion to detect in those <br />rivers’ 7-day/10-year low flows. Monitoring data in the annual hydrology reports from 1981 <br />through 2017 indicate the Williams Fork Mines have not significantly impacted the water quality <br />of the Williams Fork River. <br /> <br />G. No surface water is proposed to be discharged into, or directed into, underground mine <br />workings. <br /> <br />H. MCM does not plan to convert any monitoring wells to water supply wells. <br /> <br /> <br />I. Stream Buffer Zones - Rule 4.05.18 <br /> <br />The Williams Fork Mines included several structures located within 100 feet of the perennial <br />Williams Fork River. These structures consisted of a coal storage silo (demolished in 2018), a <br />48-inch cross country conveyor (demolished in 2017), waste water ponds, No. 5 Mine <br />dewatering wells and associated substation and access road, haul road bridge, well 259 and pond <br />HR-P1, and rail road at tail track end (demolished in 2017). The conveyor was an enclosed <br />structure as it crossed the river and the highway, therefore minimizing disturbance to the stream. <br />The coal storage silo was a concrete structure utilized to load railroad cars. These variances <br />from the 100-foot buffer zone for perennial streams have been granted by the Division upon <br />finding: 1) that the original stream channel will be restored; 2) during and after mining, the <br />water quantity and quality from the stream section from within 100 feet of the surface coal
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.