Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Williams Fork Mines Prepared by: R. Reilley M.S. GISP <br />C1981044 5 November 2018 <br /> <br /> <br /> 22 <br />undermined by longwall mining in the E and F seams. Impacts to the <br />Twentymile Sandstone were deemed very unlikely. No significant dewatering <br />of the Twentymile was anticipated. Twentymile water quality was not expected <br />to be impacted. It was considered unlikely that any open fractures would extend <br />from the longwall areas up to the Twentymile Sandstone. <br /> <br />4) Mining in the 5 and 9 Mines was not expected to significantly impact the only <br />domestic well near the permit area that may be completed in the Twentymile <br />Sandstone (Lux well). The predicted drawdown of this aquifer where the well <br />is located would not significantly impair the usefulness of the well, but mining <br />may require lowering of the pump. <br /> <br />5) Mining, mine dewatering discharge would cause a net increase in stream flow in <br />the Williams Fork River. <br /> <br />6) Underground mining in the Williams Fork Mines was not expected to directly <br />affect ground water in the Williams Fork River alluvium. <br /> <br />7) Underground entries in the Williams Fork Mines located beneath alluvium <br />would not directly affect ground water in the Yampa River alluvium. <br /> <br />8) Development mining beneath the Big Bottom alluvial valley floor of the Yampa <br />River would not impact the alluvial valley floor. <br /> <br />9) During mining of the 5 and 6 Mines, underground mine discharge from those <br />mines, combined with spoil spring discharge from the Strip Pit, would increase <br />dissolved solids concentration in the Williams Fork River. During low-flow of <br />the river and assuming worst-case mine discharges, the concentration was <br />expected to increase by 224 mg/l, from the historical mean of 332 mg/l to 576 <br />mg/l. SAR was expected to increase from the historical mean of 0.44 to 5.05. <br />The Williams Fork River would have a medium salinity hazard during low flow, <br />and would have a low to moderate sodium hazard at other times. Based on past <br />discharges, the worst-case discharges were not expected to be reached therefore, <br />the medium salinity hazard was not expected to be achieved. Impacts from <br />dissolved solids loading of the Williams Fork during irrigation season would be <br />minimal due to dilution resulting from high river stage. <br /> <br />10) After mining ceases or the mine pumps are temporarily shut off, the 5 and 6 <br />Mines will refill with water at about one-half the rate of the inflow rate during <br />mining. It is estimated that at the end of the life of the mine, it may take on the <br />order of 16 years for the mines to completely fill. At the writing of this <br />document, if the pumps are temporarily shut off, it would take about 8.6 years <br />for the currently mined area to refill. <br /> <br />11) After the 5 and 6 Mines refill, water may seep from the coal subcrop into the