Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 4 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS <br />shrub establishment when climatic or other conditions are favorable. In this manner, small and/or <br />scattered patches of additional shrubland may be established that will provide improved habitat <br />diversity, especially for sage grouse. However, since this type of reclamation is entirely dependent <br />on the vagaries of nature, dependence upon such techniques cannot be relied upon. <br />Where shrublands evolve on these "sagebrush community attempts", they will be segregated into <br />"core" areas and "ecotonal" areas (as is typically evident in nature), each with a separate woody <br />plant density success criterion. Furthermore, it has been noted repeatedly in the industry that the <br />10 -year bond responsibility period is insufficient for the adequate development of shrub <br />populations. In this regard, flexibility must be built into the success evaluation process (and/or <br />criteria) so that if a positive recruitment rate to the shrub population can be documented on <br />Colowyo revegetation, there would be no need to achieve elevated densities within a modest time- <br />frame such as the 10 -year responsibility period. <br />Given these points, the following woody plant density success criteria will be applied to Post -2008 <br />revegetation efforts: On grassland communities (approximately 60% to 80% of reclaimed acreage <br />(>10% slope) targeting the post -mining land use of grazing -land), zero woody plant density will <br />be required. However, if shrub communities evolve in these areas this acreage will count toward <br />the wildlife habitat acreage and be subject to the appropriate standards. On manifested shrublands <br />(approximately 20% or more of reclaimed acreage targeting the post -mining land use goal of <br />wildlife habitat — sage grouse brooding habitat), the following criteria will be applied depending <br />on shrubland classification. On "core areas" (areas of shrub concentration and comprising no less <br />than one-half the minimum total shrubland acreage), the eventual desirable goal shall be 1000 <br />plants per acre, but the standard shall be 375 live plants per acre. At least one-half of these totals <br />shall be sagebrush species. In "ecotonal areas" the eventual desirable goal shall be 500 plants per <br />acre, but the standard shall be 200 plants per acre. The 375 and 200 plants per acre standards <br />translate to approximately one plant for each 10.4ft. x 10.4ft. or 14.8ft. x 14.8ft. area, respectively. <br />Furthermore, Colowyo makes the commitment to establish sagebrush steppe (comprised of both <br />core and ecotonal areas) on approximately 450 acres of the post -2008 reclamation for the original <br />and South Taylor permit areas, or as otherwise agreed upon between Colowyo and CDRMS. This <br />acreage is based on the following rationale: 1) delineation of all post -2008 post -mining acreage <br />exhibiting slopes 10% or flatter; 2) elimination of all small, isolated, or impractical areas for <br />targeting this community; 3) implementing "banding" (alternating strips of grassland versus <br />shrubland) procedures on large units with long slopes that might otherwise lead to excessive <br />"snowmelt" erosion; and 4) assuming 50% shrub establishment success on the acreage that actually <br />receives shrub conducive metrics. <br />Issues with the potential longterm longevity of fourwing saltbush will require that a maximum <br />proportion of the countable shrubs used to demonstrate conformance with the applicable <br />performance standards be limited to 20%. As an example, should an area demonstrate 375 live <br />shrub plants per acre, 300 of those plants must be something other than fourwing saltbush. <br />Colowyo believes that on-site research partially refutes the data collected at other locations with <br />respect to fourwing saltbush longevity but has compromised in this case given the concerns raised <br />by the Division. <br />Diversity <br />Rule 4 Performance Standards 4-72 Revision Date: 5/25/18 <br />Revision No.: RN -07 <br />