My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-09-04_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2018-09-04_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2018 7:08:41 AM
Creation date
10/5/2018 10:39:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/4/2018
Doc Name
Volume 1 Rule 4
Section_Exhibit Name
4.01 Throuugh 4.30
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 4 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS <br />In the new South Taylor (PR -02) permit area all reclaimed post -2008 grazinglands (grasslands) <br />shall be compared to weighted parameters from the 1980 Mountain Shrub RA (52% weight), the <br />1981 Sagebrush RA (25% weight), and the 1984 Aspen RA (23% weight) in accordance with <br />4.15.7(4)(b). All post -2008 lands on the new South Taylor (PR -02) permit area that evolve into a <br />Sagebrush Steppe community' will be directly compared to the 1981 Sagebrush RA. <br />4.15.8 Revegetation Success Criteria <br />Colowyo will meet the requirements of this Subsection to insure that the post -mining vegetation <br />will be adequate for final bond release. As delineated under Subsections 4.15.7 and 2.05.4, <br />Colowyo will utilize established reference areas (see Section 4.15.7 above) for the purpose of <br />comparing vegetation information between the reclaimed area and the undisturbed area for the <br />variables of ground cover and production. For the variables of woody plant density and species <br />diversity, Colowyo shall compare revegetated area parameters against defined standards detailed <br />later in this section. Data to be used in these comparisons must be from statistically adequate <br />sampling (where necessary) as indicated in Rule 4.15.11. In instances where grazingland targeted <br />reclamation areas exhibit the characteristics of the sagebrush steppe areas and can meet the release <br />standards for core or ecotonal sagebrush steppe, Colowyo will seek release and credit for the <br />creation of those areas towards fulfillment of the minimum habitat development requirement post - <br />2008 (450 acres). In the unlikely but not impossible event that areas targeted for sagebrush steppe <br />display community characteristics that will not meet the sagebrush steepe area release criteria but <br />do for the grazingland criteria, Colowyo will designate those acres as grazingland. Colowyo will <br />have to specifically designate the location of both grazingland and sagebrush steppe areas prior to <br />the initiation of phase III bond release data collection. For descriptive purposes, "evolved" <br />sagebrush steppe areas refer to lands originally seeded to grazingland that exhibit sufficient <br />community characteristics of the sagebrush steppe community to be fully released as either core <br />or ecotonal areas. Areas defined as "targeted" sagebrush steppe are by definition the areas <br />originally seeded to the sagebrush steppe plant community that exhibit the characteristics of that <br />community and meet either the core or ecotonal requirement for full release. <br />Herbaceous Cover <br />For both Pre -2008 and Post -2008 revegetation targeting (and achieving) the rangeland land use <br />subcomponent ofrg azingland, herbaceous cover of the revegetated area will be considered <br />adequate for final bond release if it is not less than 90% of the herbaceous cover as determined <br />from the reference areas with a 90% statistical confidence utilizing a standard students statistical <br />t-test comparison of the means. As allowed under the rules promulgated on 9/14/05, these <br />comparisons may utilize one of three methods detailed under Rule 4.15.11 (2) [(a), (b) or (c)]. <br />Also as allowed by Rule 4.15.7 (4), either weighted -average or individual protocols will be <br />followed depending on the resulting community that evolves (see Section 4.15.7 above). For <br />grassland testing the weighted average approach (Rule 4.15.7 (4) (b)) will be utilized where <br />reference area data and revegetated area data are "weighted" (each combined into single values for <br />comparison) based on the proportional acreage of pre -mine communities within the disturbance <br />area footprint. Testing will then follow procedures detailed under Rule 4.15.11 (2) with preference <br />being given first to subsection (a) [direct comparison], second to subsection (c) [reverse -null <br />testing], and third subsection (b) [classic t-test]. <br />Rule 4 Performance Standards 4-64 Revision Date: 5/25/18 <br />Revision No.: RN -07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.