My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-09-24_INSPECTION - C1981041
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981041
>
2018-09-24_INSPECTION - C1981041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2018 6:48:02 AM
Creation date
9/25/2018 10:21:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
9/24/2018
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Snowcap Coal Company, Inc
Inspection Date
9/18/2018
Email Name
CCW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 18, 2018 C-1981-041/Roadside Portals CCW <br /> <br /> <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 2 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br /> <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />Photo 1: Rapid Creek had a small flow of water running through it during the inspection. <br /> <br />ROADS – Rule 4.03 <br />Construction 4.03.1(3)/4.03.2(3), Drainage 4.03.1(4)/4.03.2(4), Surfacing and Maintenance4.03.1(5) and <br />(6)/4.03.2(5) and (6), Reclamation 4.03.1(7)/4.03.2(7): <br /> The access roads on the mine site were in good repair. There were no concerns of instability o r erosion. <br /> <br />RECLAMATION SUCCESS - Rule 4.15, Rule 3: <br /> reclaimed disturbances inspected include: <br /> <br />- Conveyor Corridor Pad (Photo 2): <br />During the SL-3 Bond Release inspection (August 2018), a wildfire occurred just on the outside of the Roadside <br />mine permit next to the conveyor corridor pad. The vegetation on the reclaimed area was not burnt in the fire. <br />The site was stable and well vegetated. There were no erosional features identified. <br /> <br />- Borrow Area (Photo 3): <br />The Borrow Area was stable with well-es tablished vegetation. There were no indications of erosion at the site. <br /> <br />- Substation B (Photo 4): <br />Substation B was well vegetated and stable. There were no erosional features observed at the site. <br /> <br />-Substation A: <br />The reclaimed disturbance at Substation A was stable with well-established vegetation. There were no indications <br />of erosional features at the site.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.