My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-09-07_REVISION - C1981010 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2018-09-07_REVISION - C1981010 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2018 12:45:54 PM
Creation date
9/10/2018 9:19:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/7/2018
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
Trapper Mining Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR9
Email Name
RAR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The cover letter submitted with the revised pages states that Trapper is <br />proposing to modify the shrub density standard to include a 700 stems/acre <br />alternative standard. <br />10. Please insert a discussion of this alternate standard on page 4-101 where <br />success standards are outlined. <br />Trapper Response to Comment 10: Revised page 4-101 is enclosed as requested. In addition, a meeting <br />was held with Brett Smithers and Evan Jones of CPW at Trapper on August 27, 2018 to discuss the <br />proposed shrub density standard alternative. It was agreed in that meeting that the shrub density standard <br />should be 550 stems/acre for the no shrub clumps alternative. Thus, pending your final approval, that is <br />what we will use for future Phase III bond release sampling. Previously submitted page 4-119 has been <br />revised to reflect the revised shrub density standard and is enclosed. <br />Rule: 2.05.3 (1), (2a) <br />DRMS understands from revised page 3-15a that future development in the <br />Ithaca Pit Mining Area (I pit), is under consideration. M4 depicts both an I pit <br />and a J pit. There is no discussion of the J pit in the revised pages as submitted. <br />11. Please update the narrative to include discussion of the J pit and resubmit <br />associated revised pages. <br />Trapper Response to Comment 11: Text on enclosed page 3-15a has been revised to show "J" (Jennings) <br />Pit on that page as well as the "I" (Ithaca) Pit. Other clarifications of the text were made as well to make the <br />section read more clearly. <br />DRMS notes that revised page 3-40b references reclamation proposed to take <br />place at the current topsoil pile located at Horse Gulch Fill. And, that this <br />reclamation once completed would reduce the inspection interval for the fill. <br />12. Please discuss the reclamation to be carried out specifically addressing the topsoil <br />pile; will the soil be utilized somewhere or remain in place? <br />Trapper Response to Comment 12: The topsoil pile in question will be used up during the 2018 and 2019 <br />reclamation field seasons. After the pile is removed, reclamation seeding will take place. Following <br />seeding, the reclaimed area will be included in a forthcoming Phase I bond release application. <br />13. As changes to fill inspection intervals require DRMs approval, please update the <br />text on page 3-40b to incorporate: ...go to once a year 'once approved by the <br />Division" and will take place... <br />Trapper Response to Comment 13: Text on page 340b was revised as requested and the page is enclosed. <br />Rule: 2.05.3 (4) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.