My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-09-06_REVISION - M1973021
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1973021
>
2018-09-06_REVISION - M1973021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2025 3:56:51 AM
Creation date
9/7/2018 2:49:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1973021
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/6/2018
Doc Name Note
PART 2 OF 7
Doc Name
Request For Amendment To Permit
From
GEI Consultants
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM6
Email Name
ECS
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. Recommendations <br /> The minimum FOS for the mine highwalls within the South and West Quarries has been <br /> established at 1.2. This is considered the minimum FOS for rock in mine highwall situations. <br /> Designing highwalls for stability involves developing accurate and representative geological <br /> conditions within the South Quarry and West Quarry including: <br /> • Rock type <br /> • Structural conditions within the rock(discontinues,joint sets, faults, etc.) <br /> • Geological stratification <br /> • Rock weathering <br /> • Rock strength <br /> Highwall design for the South and West Quarries is dependent on many different parameters. <br /> As the above mentioned geological conditions are highly variable within the mine, any <br /> design recommendations carry geotechnical risk. All mine highwall design <br /> recommendations made herein carry some risk of failure. For the both quarries, GEI <br /> weighed AI's desire to optimize reserves against developing highwall configurations that <br /> maximize local and global highwall stability. <br /> Our recommendations presented below are based on drilling results conducted by various <br /> entities at various times within the life of the South Quarry as well as annual report mapping <br /> conducted by GEI. While these are considered to be representative of the overall material <br /> within the mine,there will be variability within the quarries,that could cause assumptions <br /> presented herein to become invalid. <br /> 6.1.1 Highwall Recommendations <br /> The results of kinematic and slope stability analyses conducted as part of our scope indicate <br /> that two main highwall/bench configurations will result in an acceptable FOS (>1.2) while <br /> allowing Al to best utilize the remining aggregate reserves within the Morrison Quarry. In <br /> addition, highwall locations where the sillimanitic gneiss is encountered at in-wall <br /> thicknesses greater than '/4 of the highwall height have a separate configuration. <br /> 6.1.1.1 South Quarry <br /> GEI's recommendations for South Quarry highwall configurations are presented below: <br /> • The recommended final highwall configuration within south and west highwalls <br /> (north and east facing) below El. 7,000 feet consists of up to 30H:70V <br /> (horizontal:vertical) benches. These areas exhibited favorable geological conditions <br /> Aggregate Industries Morrison Quarry GEI Consultants, Inc. <br /> AM-06 Geotechnical Stability Exhibit 38 August 2018 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.