My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-09-04_PERMIT FILE - M1996081
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1996081
>
2018-09-04_PERMIT FILE - M1996081
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 2:18:21 AM
Creation date
9/5/2018 11:01:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1996081
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
9/4/2018
Doc Name
Response to Filing Deficiencies
From
Braun
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
ERR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
memorandum is not signed nor dated. In accordance with Rule 6.3.9, please submit an affidavit <br /> or receipt indicating the date on which the application was placed with the local County Clerk <br /> and Recorder for public review. Any changes or additions to the application on file with the <br /> Division, must also be reflected in the public review copy in accordance with Rule 1.6.2(2). <br /> Please submit proof that the public review copy has been updated with a copy of this letter and <br /> associated response. <br /> Response: Clint must have forgotten to order the clerk to sign off on the sheet. Since we <br /> need to refile the changes with the Clerk and Recorder, a new acceptance sheet will be generated <br /> and I will make certain that it is signed. <br /> Comments 10 and 11: The copy of the notice to the local Board of County Commissioners <br /> doesn't appear to be the notice provided in the application packet as the first paragraph lacks <br /> the county name where the operation is located and the second paragraph lacks the selected <br /> post-mining land use of rangeland. Please use the notice provided in the application packet and <br /> submit proof of notice in the form of a certified mail return receipt or a date-stamped copy of the <br /> notice acknowledging receipt by the appropriate board, in accordance with Rule 1.6.2(1)(a)(ii). <br /> The copy of the notice to the local Soil Conservation District does not identify the correct post- <br /> mining land use as selected on the application form and discussed in the reclamation plan. <br /> Please submit a new copy of the notice to the local Soil Conservation District noting the affected <br /> lands will be reclaimed to Rangeland. <br /> Response: On the Commissioners document, I inadvertently forgot to add the county, and to <br /> normal citizens, rangeland is the same as grazing, but for the regulators rangeland means <br /> something special, so, I have added the word "rangeland"to the form. For the soil conservation <br /> district the word rangeland has also been added. You have not advised, but copies of acceptance <br /> by both groups will be collected and passed on to DRMS. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.