My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-09-04_REVISION - C1980007 (11)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2018-09-04_REVISION - C1980007 (11)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 12:42:15 PM
Creation date
9/4/2018 11:58:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/4/2018
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
CAM Mining, LLC
Type & Sequence
PR15
Email Name
LDS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />64 <br /> <br />A stipulation regarding the North Fork of the Gunnison AVF was included in the <br />original permit approval requiring MCC to demonstrate that the mining operation's fresh <br />water usage will not materially damage the quantity and quality of water supplying the <br />alluvial valley floor. This stipulation was complied with on March 25, 1982, with the <br />following response: <br /> <br />Mining activities at the West Elk Mine will not affect the quantity and quality of water in <br />the North Fork. The coal seam to be mined lies a significant distance above the North <br />Fork and is not considered to be an aquifer. Surface facilities have been designed and <br />located to prevent contamination of the river. <br /> <br />Alluvial deposits in Sylvester Gulch and along the North Fork of the Gunnison River <br />next to the mine are too small or irregular in shape to support agricultural activities, and <br />therefore do not qualify as AVFs. High terraces along the North Fork of the Gunnison <br />River are colluvial upland deposits and, therefore, do not qualify as AVFs. <br /> <br />Changes in the quantity of water supplied to the North Fork AVF depend on the <br />difference between water used by MCC and water discharged to the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison River. MCC’s total water use is expected to be about 150 acre-feet per year <br />during maximum projected production. This represents less than 0.04 percent of the <br />average annual stream flow on the North Fork. Since less than 70 percent of this use is <br />deemed to be consumptive use, the loss is actually less than 0.03 percent of the average <br />stream flow. In addition, water is withdrawn during higher flows when MCC's water <br />rights are in priority. During low flow periods when other calls for water exist, MCC <br />would not be withdrawing water. <br /> <br />Water quality changes resulting from MCC’s discharge of waste water will not <br />constitute material damage because no measurable change in water quality is expected <br />to occur. Of the 200,000 gallons/day maximum projected use, 38,000 gallons/day <br />(28.5 acre-feet/year) would be required for potable water use. Consumptive use of <br />potable water would be minimal. Assuming no consumptive use, one would expect a <br />discharge of less than 0.06 cubic feet per second (cfs) during plant operation. This use <br />and return flow is insignificant compared to the flows in the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison. Even during the lowest flow on record (17 cfs) for the 1934 through 1979 <br />period of record on the North Fork at Somerset, the potable water use would be less than <br />0.4 percent of the flow. The return water will be treated to meet NPDES effluent limits <br />and should pose no problem for downstream irrigation use of AVFs. <br /> <br />The remaining 162,000 gallons per day (gpd) of water use is for coal spraying and dust <br />suppression activities. The estimate is conservative and includes a 15 percent <br />contingency for leakage. Consumptive use is difficult to estimate, but should be less <br />than 85 percent. The return flow along with any seepage water would be collected and <br />routed to sediment pond MB-1. This water is then treated and either released to the <br />North Fork or recycled. Assuming 138,000 gpd (0.2 cfs) is the consumptive use, only <br />about one percent of the lowest flow on record would be consumed. The information <br />provided above demonstrates that there is no risk of material damage to the quantity and <br />quality of water supplying the AVF identified on the North Fork of the Gunnison River. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.