My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-09-04_REVISION - C1980007 (11)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2018-09-04_REVISION - C1980007 (11)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 12:42:15 PM
Creation date
9/4/2018 11:58:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/4/2018
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
CAM Mining, LLC
Type & Sequence
PR15
Email Name
LDS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />59 <br /> <br />roads, houses and other structures downstream from the dam. MCC has <br />summarized in the permit application the predicted effects of a catastrophic <br />failure of the Monument Dam determined in a Dam Breach Analysis, dated <br />February 8, 1984. Predicted out-of-channel floodwater depths are in the range <br />0.3 to 3.5 ft. in the lower 6 miles of Minnesota Creek. Predicted floodwater <br />velocity is in the range 13 feet per second to 42 feet per second. As many as <br />four houses could suffer shallow flooding, although loss of life would not be <br />expected. Depending on proximity to the creek, houses could suffer structural <br />collapse as a result of foundation erosion. Extensive erosion and resource <br />damage would occur along Minnesota Creek and a sediment bar would <br />probably be deposited in the North Fork of the Gunnison River. In order to <br />mitigate any potential impacts to the dam from mining-induced seismicity, <br />MCC has committed to the following measures (which are set forth in more <br />detail in Section 2.05.6(6) of the permit application): <br /> <br />1. Surveying the structures downstream from the dam that could be <br />impacted by dam failure six months prior to longwall mining in the South <br />of Divide area, and incorporating the survey into the permit application as <br />a revision. <br /> <br />2. Conducting annual aerial photo surveys of landslides located north and <br />south of the reservoir, <br /> <br />3. Installing and periodically surveying monuments on the dam and the <br />north, south, and east edges of the reservoir, <br /> <br />4. Monitoring water levels in piezometers installed in the dam, <br /> <br />5. Installing and periodically surveying monuments on the landslide that <br />adjoins the south abutment of the dam, <br /> <br />6. Monitoring seismicity at a seismic station previously installed on <br />Monument Dam and to be installed in selected E-seam panels, <br /> <br />7. Removing any significant sediment accumulation from the reservoir <br />caused by mining, <br /> <br />8. Constructing a stability berm and buttress at the dam, and making other <br />modifications to restore the dam to a 1.5 static safety factor and to enable <br />the dam to withstand the predicted maximum seismic event from mining <br />in the South of Divide area of 2.3 on the Richter scale and peak ground <br />acceleration of 0.15 g, <br /> <br />9. Surveying monuments on the dam within two days of a seismic event that <br />exceeds 0.15 g, and if the integrity of the dam or reservoir appears <br />threatened, immediately notifying the Division, the Minnesota Reservoir <br />Company, the U.S. Forest Service, the Office of the State Engineer, and <br />other appropriate agencies,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.