My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-08-30_PERMIT FILE - C1982057 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2018-08-30_PERMIT FILE - C1982057 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 9:20:30 AM
Creation date
9/4/2018 9:13:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/30/2018
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 11 WILDLIFE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Big Game <br />• The only big game species that frequent the extension area are elk (Cervus elaphus) and mule <br />deer fOdocoileus hemionus). Although pronghorn (Antilocapra americanal are known to occur <br />in the vicinity of the Seneca II -W Mine, they do not range into the higher elevations and rugged <br />terrain around the extension area. CDOW WRIS mapping classified the extension area as <br />severe winter range and critical habitat for elk. The area was considered summer range for <br />mule deer. <br />Results of winter aerial big game surveys are presented in Table 11-43. Information was <br />summarized to allow comparison of the 28 square mile area around the Seneca 11-W South <br />Extension study area with the previous 35 square mile Seneca II -W Mine survey area. Except <br />in 1995 (the only year when snow cover was relatively light during the survey), elk densities <br />have been notably higher on the Seneca II -W Mine survey area. Mule deer numbers during <br />winter surveys were, as would be expected, very low. <br />It is possible that elk tended to avoid the extension area and its surroundings during periods of <br />heavy snow cover. The distribution of sightings during the surveys supported this conjecture. <br />Big game sightings in all years tended to cluster northwest and northeast of the extension area, <br />along the Hubberson Gulch and Sage Creek drainages, respectively. Few animals were <br />observed in the south part of the survey area, at the higher elevations. Overall, elevations <br />• encompassed by the extension survey area were higher than those of the Seneca 11-W Mine <br />survey area. Also, much of the extension area consists of high -elevation, gradually sloping <br />terrain, which tends to accumulate very deep snow cover. These factors would have rendered <br />the area less attractive to wintering elk. <br />The only big game recorded during fieldwork in October 1997 were mule deer. Several deer <br />were encountered each day, as biologists searched for raptor nests. Many of these animals <br />were not directly observed, and most could not be classified, due to the density of vegetation <br />cover. Deer were often only heard, as they fled through thick underbrush. <br />Raptors <br />A number of raptor species were considered potential breeders in the vicinity of the expansion <br />area. These included the golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetosl, red-taited hawk fButeo jamaicensis), <br />Swainson's hawk (Buten swainsoni), Cooper's hawk (Accipter cooperi), sharp -shinned hawk <br />(Accipiter striatus), northern harrier (Circus cyaneus), American kestrel (Falco sparverius), <br />turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), and great horned owl (Bubo virginianus). <br />Prairie falcons (Falco mexicanus), peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus), northern goshawks <br />. (Accipter gentilis), and bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) could occur on the area, but <br />would not be expected to breed. No cliffs suitable for nesting falcons are present on or within <br />37 Revised 9/98 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.