My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-08-30_PERMIT FILE - C1982057 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2018-08-30_PERMIT FILE - C1982057 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 9:12:35 AM
Creation date
9/4/2018 9:10:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/30/2018
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 10 Vegetation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Sagebrush type is the most extensive type on the permit area, occupying approximately . <br />707.5 acres (52 percent of the area). It is characteristically found on lower slopes and <br />exposed ridgetops that have predominantly west, northwest, or southwest aspects (Exhibit <br />10-1, Figures 10-5, and 10-6). Species composition was variable and included stands <br />dominated by mountain big sagebrush and alkali sagebrush, basin big sagebrush, and <br />mountain snowberry. The herbaceous understo ry was also variable. Shrubs ranged in height <br />from 1 to 4 feet (.6 to 1.2 m). Several inclusions of chokecherry-se rviceberry occurred <br />in the type, as were several grass, sedge, or cattail meadows along Hubberson Gulch, Water <br />Trough Cu lch, and Dry Creek. In addition, there were small areas that were dominated <br />exclusively by mulesear (Wy ethic amplexicaulis). The complex distribution, lack of <br />distinct boundaries associated with these variants, and the small area covered by these <br />types, however, made it impractical to map them as individual types. <br />Canopy cover and percent frequency data are presented in Table 10-3. Total plant cover <br />(shrubs and herbs) was 83.5 percent in the original reference area and 62.4 percent in the <br />proposed mine area. Big sagebrush contributed about 40 percent cover in both, while <br />snowberry contribute d 27 percent in the original reference area and 14 percent in the <br />proposed mine area. Big sagebrush was more widespread (90 percent frequency) in the study • <br />area plots than the reference area plots (76 percen t. frequency); snowberry occurred in a <br />nearly equal number of plots on the study and reference areas. <br />Perennial forbs and grasses with the highest cover and frequency percentages in the <br />original reference area included bl uebunch wheatgrass, fowl bluegrass, and American vetch. <br />In the mine permit study area, fowl bluegrass and lupine showed the highest cover and <br />frequency among grasses and forbs. <br />Estimated average shrub density for the sagebrush vegetation type on the mine study area <br />2 <br />was 51.9 stems/SOm (4,203 stems/acre); reference area average density was estimated to be <br />64.0 stems/SOm2 (5,183 stems/acre). Snowbe rry was more common (higher density) and big <br />sagebrush less common on the reference area as compared to mine study area samples (Tables <br />4-25 and 4-26). <br />Herbaceous production in the Sagebrush vegetation type shows that graminoids contributed <br />slightly more production than forbs. The single dominant species was again Kentucky <br />bluegrass which contributed about 37 percent of the total gra minoid production. Other • <br />species making up most of the remaining production were western wheatgrass (Agropy ron <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.