Laserfiche WebLink
Deep Cut LLC- 22 West Pit Page 9 <br /> Adequacy response 02 Permit # M-2017-032 <br /> According to the measurement directly off the Acad map it is 798 feet so your estimate <br /> of 800 feet is confirmed. <br /> Please include costs in the bond estimate for at least one of the specified methods of <br /> reclamation for the approximate 800 feet of shoreline (either retopsoiling and <br /> revegetating or riprap placement). If topsoil or riprap material will need to be imported to <br /> the site for reclamation, please be sure to add a separate cost for this task. <br /> Included is a cost to resoil and seed 0.50 acres that covers the 800 feet of bank needing <br /> that work, as you suggest. <br /> Exhibit S - Permanent Man-Made Structures (Rule 6.4.19): <br /> 12) The Applicant has provided proof that all seven structure owners identified in Exhibit S <br /> were mailed structure agreements for the structures they own within 200 feet of the <br /> proposed affected land. the Applicant provided signed structure agreements for five of the <br /> seven structure owners. However, these agreements require revision in order for them to <br /> be considered properly executed, as detailed in the Division's Preliminary Adequacy <br /> Review letter. Structure agreements for City of Aurora and Donald Memeda have not <br /> been submitted. <br /> The Applicant provided a geotechnical stability evaluation for the chainlink fence owned <br /> by Donald Memeda, for the powerline pole closest to the mine owned by Southeast <br /> Colorado Power Association, for the ditch owned by City of Aurora, and for Co Rd 22 <br /> owned by Otero County Commissioners. the evaluation does not include an analysis for <br /> structures located within 200 feet of the proposed affected land that are owned by Valco, <br /> Inc., Don Hansen, or Daniel L. Lytle. Therefore,prior to the application decision date, the <br /> Applicant must submit either: <br /> a. Properly executed structure agreements for these structure owners; or <br /> b. An appropriate engineering evaluation that demonstrates their structures shall not <br /> be damaged by activities occurring at the mining operation. <br /> Attached is a copy of the new Valco, Inc's structure. <br /> I didn't submit analysis for the Valco, the Lytle and Hanson structures as they are <br /> farther away then the closest structures that we determined have safety factors greater <br /> then 1.5 to 1. The analyzed structures were the closest structures to where excavation <br /> will take place. It just makes sense that if the structure is farther from the excavation <br /> area it will have a safety factor greater then a closer structure that an analysis was done <br /> for. But for sake of completing this I have revised the geotechnical analysis to include <br /> the Hanson and Lytle buildings to the table and cross-sections. Both have safety factors <br />