My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-07-02_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (19)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2018-07-02_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (19)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 7:44:40 AM
Creation date
8/9/2018 8:44:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/2/2018
Doc Name
Hydrology Description
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.04.7
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of about 11.9 gpm. As noted, this is based on the situation as is but does not account for the <br />rerouting of 2nd Park Lateral through the HDPE pipeline and the suspension of irrigation during <br />mining which will reduce discharge into the pit. <br />The data from the slug test at GW -N9 (overburden and coal zone combined as described above) <br />show a higher K value (2.1 ft/day) than the averages for the overburden and coal zones. As <br />expected, calculating discharge rates from this test results in higher discharge rates than those <br />calculated from the zone averages. Using the K value from GW -N9, an average gradient of 0.05, <br />a saturated thickness of 25.0 feet and a pit length of 2,197 feet the estimated discharge would be <br />equal to (2.1 ft/day) x (0.05) x (25.Oft x 2197ft) = 5767 ft3 per day or 2.105 x 106 ft3 per year or <br />about 29.9cgpm or a factor of 5 higher than that calculated from the averages of the overburden <br />and coal zones of about 5.7 gpm. However, the GW -N 9 location is only 775 feet directly down <br />gradient (see Map 2.04.7-3) from the 2nd Park Lateral and the test was done on 7/17/86 during <br />the height of the irrigation season and the recharge of the overburden. This suggests that <br />discharge from the highwall after the 2nd Park Lateral has been diverted through the HDPE <br />pipeline will be closer to the lower discharge rate than to the higher rate indicated from the GW - <br />N9 test data (see Table 7-5 a copy of which is contained in Appendix 2.04.7-2). <br />Evapotranspiration Evapotranspiration (ET) is a component of discharge in the NHN permit <br />area. Studies at the New Horizon Mine with similar vegetation types and uses to the NHN permit <br />area (see New Horizon 2 permit Section 2.04.7) indicate that the annual ET rate is on the order of <br />2.1 acre-ft/acre. Based on the surface area of NHN (328.88 acres) the annual ET is about 674 <br />acre—ft per year. Irrigation run off water contributes to the stream flow of Tuttle Draw and Coal <br />Canyon. The stream flows of Tuttle Draw and Coal Canyon in turn contributes to the flow of the <br />San Miguel River, at the least, two and one half miles downstream of mining and the mining <br />disturbance. The total volume of water that could be evapotranspired from the NHN vegetation <br />study is estimated under ideal conditions. In reality the evapotranspiration rates are less. In many <br />areas shallow soils and rock ledges restrict rooting depths and inhibit maximum plant growth, <br />thereby reducing ET rates. <br />Aquifer Characteristics of the New Horizon North Mining Areas Previous aquifer testing of <br />the Dakota Formation coal strata in the NHN permit area indicates that the overburden, coal and <br />underburden zone transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity values in the NHN permit area are <br />low to very low (see Tables 7-5 and 7-6 in Appendix 2.04.7-2 of this application). The <br />overburden and underburden aquifers have the higher values and the coal aquifer has the lowest <br />transmissive properties. There is approximately one order of magnitude range in the <br />transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity values for the overburden, coal and underburden <br />aquifers. This suggests that there is a high degree of spatial variability within the aquifers. <br />Storage coefficients for the various stratigraphic zones vary from about 10-4 to 10-5 for the <br />overburden and the coal/underburden zones, respectively. Transmissivities (T) for overburden <br />Section 2.04.7 Page 7 March 2018 (TR -16) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.