Laserfiche WebLink
REVISED EXHIBIT L <br /> Reclamation Costs <br /> In order to calculate maximum potential reclamation liability to the State, we have selected a point in <br /> time where reclamation costs could be at a maximum. It is assumed that the time of maximum mining <br /> disturbance will be at the end of Phase 1. During this scenario, mining is almost complete in Cell 6 <br /> and reclamation has included backfilling and grading side slopes in Cells 1 through 5 and most of <br /> Cell 6 with overburden material stripped from the active mining areas. Since additional backfilling <br /> with off-site material and groundwater pond and wetland development was expected to occur, no <br /> topsoil or seeding has occurred on the backfilled side slopes. However, if off-site backfill material is <br /> not available and water rights for permanent augmentation have not been secured, a soil-bentonite <br /> slurry wall will be constructed around MA1 to separate alluvial groundwater from the below-grade <br /> mining cells. No disturbance has occurred in MA2, MA3, or MA4. <br /> The active mining area includes Mining Cell 6. In front of the active mining face, an area <br /> approximately 100 feet wide by 500 feet long will have been pre-stripped in anticipation of mining <br /> (1 acre). The pre-stripped area receives topsoil placement, final grading, and seeding for revegetation. <br /> The active mining highwall is approximately 500 feet long and adjacent 500-foot long cell walls have <br /> not yet been backfilled. Both the mining highwall and adjacent cell walls (1,500 linear feet total) are <br /> backfilled and rough graded to 3H:1 V slopes(assume move 1-foot of material over entire grading area) <br /> in preparation for topsoil placement, final grading, and seeding for revegetation. <br /> Stockpiles for visual screening have been constructed along the west and south side of MA1. The <br /> stockpiles contain approximately 35,000 cubic yards (yds) of overburden and topsoil material and <br /> cover an area of about 5.5 acres. From stripping the active mining area, an additional 47,000 yds of <br /> overburden and topsoil are available in other stockpiles on-site. Haul distances to use the stockpiled <br /> topsoil for on-site reclamation ranges from less than 100 feet to over 1,500 feet, but averages only <br /> about 300 feet. <br /> Miscellaneous disturbed areas at the point of maximum disturbance will include the scale house and <br /> staging area (5 acres), internal haul roads and the main site access road (3 acres), and stockpile areas <br /> (5.5 acres). Additionally, the sediment pond area (1.9 acres) will not have been mined and will need <br /> to be backfilled prior to final reclamation. These areas will be tilled in preparation for topsoil <br /> placement, final grading, and seeding for revegetation. It is estimated that the combined area of these <br /> disturbances will be approximately 15.4 acres. <br /> If available, a minimum of 12 inches of topsoil or growth medium will be placed on all disturbed areas <br /> following backfilling, scarifying, and/or rough grading. Enough topsoil should be stockpiled on-site <br /> for reclamation. Final grading of the topsoiUgrowth medium is assumed to move 0.5 feet of material <br /> over the entire grading area and will prepare the surface for seeding. In this scenario, only the Upland <br /> Grass Seed—Soil Stabilization mix will be used. After initial seeding and the first season's growth, it <br /> is estimated that approximately 20 percent of the seeded area will need to be re-seeded. <br /> Each aspect is listed in the following table with associated disturbed area. Please refer to Exhibit D, <br /> Pre-Mining/Mining Plan, for a listing of disturbed areas that total 49 acres. This estimate will follow <br /> the same order as the listing in Exhibit D. Since all structures used in the mining operation are portable, <br /> it is assumed that removal of the structures do not have associated costs. <br /> Irwin/Thomas Mine <br /> DBMS 112 Permit Application Adequacy Response Page 33 <br />