My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-07-10_INSPECTION - M1977342
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1977342
>
2018-07-10_INSPECTION - M1977342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2018 9:55:18 AM
Creation date
7/16/2018 8:36:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
7/10/2018
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Henderson
Email Name
SJM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERMIT #: M-1977-342 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: SJM <br />INSPECTION DATE: June 20, 2018 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />The Henderson Mine was inspected by Stephanie Mitchell with the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />(Division/DRMS) as part of the Division's monitoring inspection program. Mr. Miguel Hamarat and Mr. Alex <br />Ungers with Climax Molybdenum - Henderson Operations (Henderson) was present during the inspection. <br />The purpose of the inspection was to observe the stormwater structures located around the mine facility. <br />The Division and Henderson staff inspected the sixteen outfalls at the mine. A list of the outfalls with <br />comments from the inspection is below: <br />OF -1: BMP's at this outfall location consist of a series of rock check dams leading to a rip -rap outfall. The <br />outfall was dry and appeared to be functioning properly. <br />OF -2: BMP's at this outfall location consist of a series of rock check dams leading to a sedimentation pond <br />above the rip -rap outfall. The sedimentation pond contained water above the outfall and has a large amount <br />of sediment in it. The Division recommends cleaning out the sedimentation pond. The outfall appeared to be <br />functioning properly. <br />OF -3: BMP's at this outfall location consist of an engineered wetland and a sedimentation pond. Water was <br />flowing though the outfall and the outfall appeared to be functioning properly. <br />OF -4: BMP's at this outfall location consist of a vegetated area at the bottom of a slope. The outfall appeared <br />to be functioning properly. <br />OF -5: BMP's at this outfall location consist of rip -rap and vegetation leading to a sedimentation pond above a <br />culvert. The sedimentation pond contained water and appeared to be functioning properly. <br />OF -6: BMP's at this outfall location consist of rip -rap and a sedimentation pond. The outfall appeared to be <br />functioning properly. <br />OF -7: BMP's at this outfall location consist of rip -rap and rock check dams. The outfall was dry and appeared <br />to be functioning properly. <br />OF -8a: BMP's at this outfall location consist of ditch with a series of rock check dams leading to a <br />sedimentation pond. The ditch and sedimentation pond contained water and appeared to be functioning <br />properly. <br />OF -8b: BMP's at this outfall location consist of a series of ditch with a series of rock check dams leading to a <br />rip -rap outfall. The ditch leading to the outfall contained water and appeared to be functioning properly. <br />Sediment was observed in the road crossing culverts above the outfall. The Division recommends are culverts <br />are cleaned out to maintain the function of the culverts. <br />OF -8c: BMP's at this outfall location consist of a ditch with a series of rock check dams leading to a rip -rap <br />outfall. The outfall was wet and contained sediment above the rip -rap outfall. A minor erosion feature was <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.