My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-07-02_PERMIT FILE - M2017013
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2017013
>
2018-07-02_PERMIT FILE - M2017013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2021 9:20:07 PM
Creation date
7/2/2018 10:33:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2017013
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/2/2018
Doc Name Note
RE: Comment Dated 6/8/2018
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Todd Creek Village
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Earth Engineering Consultants.LLC <br /> EEC Project No. 1122096 <br /> Signal Resen oir Improvements <br /> August 5.2015 <br /> Page I <br /> Based on the design documents provided us, we understand the proposed final embankment will <br /> be constructed as shown in Figure 2 and described as follows. The embankment will be <br /> constructed with upstream and downstream slopes of 3:1 (horizontal to vertical). We understand <br /> the embankment will be constructed with a maximum height (from toe to crest) of approximately <br /> 15 feet. The toe drain will be located near downstream toe as per the civil details provided by <br /> the design consultant, as highlighted on the various slope-stability diagrams included in <br /> Appendix D of this report. Based on the sections, elevations, and subsurface conditions, the <br /> embankment will generally consist of apparent lean clay fills, overlying native lean clay, <br /> overlying bedrock. We understand any new fill or backfill materials would be similar (hydraulic <br /> conductivity and friction angle) to the existing embankment lean clay subsoils. <br /> Based on the information outlined in our Suhsuirface Exploration Report and the provided <br /> embankment geometry, seepage and stability analyses were carried out by EEC. Those analyses <br /> assumes a high water elevation at the "normal maintained water level" elevation of 5145. <br /> Seepage was analyzed at steady-state flow. The stability analyses were carried out using <br /> Bishop's method of slices with pore pressures integrated from the seepage analysis for high <br /> water elevations, or from a predicted piezometric surface for end of construction and rapid <br /> drawdown scenarios. Soil parameters used in the analyses were included below in Table 1. <br /> Summary of Soil Parameters Used in Seepage and Stability Analyses <br /> Wet Unit Coefficient of Effective Effective Undrained <br /> Soil Zone Soil Description Weight Permeability Friction Cohesion, Shear <br /> Angle, C' Strength,S„ <br /> Fill Sandi Lean Clav 123 pcf 10 s10 cm/sec 250 250 800 psf <br /> Native Sande Lean Clay 126 pcf 1.0 X10`cm/sec 200 200 800 psf <br /> Dram Sand 130 pcf 3 30x 10-4 cm/sec 320 0 0 psf <br /> Bedrock Claystone.Siltstone 123 pcf 1 0 X10 cm/sec Impenetrable Impenetrable Impenetrable <br /> Note that the soil parameters in the above table and used in the design, may vary from those <br /> encountered in the construction phase, yet reflect conservative conditions in design or were <br /> estimated based on our experience with similar materials and/or available literature. Such <br /> variations/assumptions used in the design include: <br /> • Sandy lean clay: chosen friction angle was less than determined in laboratory testing. <br /> Material was assumed to be a relatively homogeneous, isotropic material. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.