My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-07-02_PERMIT FILE - M2017013
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2017013
>
2018-07-02_PERMIT FILE - M2017013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2021 9:20:07 PM
Creation date
7/2/2018 10:33:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2017013
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/2/2018
Doc Name Note
RE: Comment Dated 6/8/2018
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Todd Creek Village
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Earth Engineering Consultants,LLC <br /> EEC Project No. 1122096 <br /> Signal Reservoir Improvements <br /> August 5,2015 <br /> Page 7 <br /> ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Moisture Density Relationship-Standard Proctor Density <br /> In-situ moisture contents within the overburden cohesive subsoils ranged from as"dry as/low as" <br /> approximately 5% to as high as approximately 34%, (the higher moisture contents were <br /> encountered within the near surface subsoils at the toe of the embankment slope), with a median <br /> of about 15% for the California barrel and split-spoon samples collected during the drilling <br /> operations. In-situ moisture contents within the underlying bedrock formation ranged from as <br /> "dry as/low as" approximately 7% to as high as approximately 33% with a median of about <br /> 19.5% for the California barrel and split-spoon samples collected during the drilling operations. <br /> The in-situ moisture contents in conjunction with the recorded standard penetration test (SPT) or <br /> resistance blow counts as presented on the boring logs included in the Appendix correspond to <br /> consistencies of medium stiff to stiff overburden materials, and moderately hard to hard and/or <br /> poorly cemented within the underlying bedrock formation. EEC also performed standard Proctor <br /> density (ASTM Specification D698) tests on various composite samples of overburden and <br /> underlying bedrock materials collected during our field exploration. The various composite <br /> samples as identified herein are labeled "A" through "Y' and in general consisted of overburden <br /> soils (i.e., the upper 10-feet of overburden soils from various borings including the interior <br /> reservoir borings and the recently completed dam evaluation borings) and of the underlying <br /> bedrock materials (i.e., approximately 10 to 20-feet below existing site grades from various <br /> borings). <br /> For each composite sample soil classification/Atterberg Limits and minus No. 200 Sieve wash <br /> gradations were performed on each sample and on selected samples standard Proctor density <br /> tests (ASTM Specification D698) test were performed. The results of the soil classification and <br /> standard Proctor density testing on the composite samples collected during our subsurface <br /> exploration are presented below. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.