My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-06-25_REVISION - M2011001 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2011001
>
2018-06-25_REVISION - M2011001 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2021 3:29:58 AM
Creation date
6/25/2018 4:15:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2011001
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/25/2018
Doc Name Note
Evaluation of Reclamation Improvements
Doc Name
Formal Complaint
From
Timothy Iverson
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 5,2018 <br /> Page 5 <br /> • There is no erosion protection along the length of the riverside berm or along the bank of the <br /> lake. The lack of erosion protection increases the probability that the riverside berm will be <br /> breached during flood events which overtop the berm. <br /> • The heavy riprap at the entrance and exit of the spillways does not extend to the limits shown <br /> on the As-Constructed Drawings by Tetra Tech dated June 16, 2016. There was evidence of <br /> voids and settlement in most of the spillway riprap. This indicates the filter layer may be absent <br /> or was not installed correctly and is not functioning correctly to prevent fines from washing out. <br /> The riprap is not graded correctly to produce a dense interlocking mat. The lack of a functioning <br /> filter and interlocking mat make undermining and washout of the riprap likely during high <br /> spillway discharges. <br /> • The concrete cut-off walls should be founded on sheet pile cut-offs to prevent undermining and <br /> washout of the structure during high spillway discharges. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> The probability is high that the riverside berm surrounding the reclamation area will be overtopped and <br /> breached during flood events greater than the 2-Year Flood. The high probability is based on the narrow <br /> width of the riverside berm, minimal freeboard, lack of erosion protection and inadequate spillways to <br /> reduce differential heads. Previous breaches of the riverside berm resulted in significant damages to the <br /> site including severe erosion of banks, sediment deposition in the lake and washout of the spillway <br /> structures. Similar damages are possible if the berm is breached in the future. The detrimental impacts <br /> of mining pit capture by a river are well documented(See USBR Rehabilitation of Floodplain Mining <br /> Pits: Interim Report Detailing Initial Plans and Procedures 2005). <br /> We recommend the following improvements be made to stabilize the site and prevent breaching of the <br /> riverside berm during future flood events. <br /> 1. The low area in the riverside berm located at the northwest corner of the lake should be <br /> uniformly graded to elevation 4686.0 feet which is approximately equal to the pre-mining <br /> elevation and is above the 2-Year Flood elevation of 4685.3 feet. <br /> 2. The riverside berm should be protected with riprap on both the riverbank and pitside for the <br /> critical section of the berm extending from the inlet spillway approximately 3,200 feet around <br /> the river bend at the northwest comer of the lake. The riprap erosion protection should conform <br /> to the typical sections and requirements in the UDFCD Guidelines. <br /> 3. The inlet and outlet spillways should be increased in width to 100 feet as required by the <br /> UDFCD Guidelines. Concrete cut off walls for the spillway should be founded on sheet pile <br /> designed in accordance with the UDFCD Drainage Criteria Manual. Riprap erosion protection <br /> should meet the requirements of the UDFCD Guidelines and have a granular filter designed in <br /> accordance with the UDFCD Drainage Criteria Manual. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.