Laserfiche WebLink
Decommissioning Plan Schwartzwalder Mine <br /> <br /> <br />RML CO-369-06 <br />Cotter Corporation (N.S.L.) 8 March 2017 <br />into account uncertainty associated with sampling and analytical variability, this result is <br />consistent with approximate equilibrium across U-238 decay products. <br /> <br />2.2 Historical Cleanup levels <br />The ore transfer pad area was remediated under a cleanup standard of 5 picocuries of radium-226 <br />per gram of surface soil (5 pCi/g). This standard applies to soil concentrations above <br />background levels. In the Ore Sorter/Crusher Area and portions of the Old Ponds Area, the <br />objective was to excavate contaminated soils such that remaining soils and rock were below 20 <br />micro-roentgen per hour (µR/h), a gamma radiation exposure rate expected at that time to <br />correspond to less than 5 pCi/g of Ra-226 in soil based on previous experience. The 5 pCi/g <br />Ra-226 criterion was also used for remediation of the drying trenches. For each of these RML <br />areas, the 5 pCi/g above background standard for soil Ra-226 was used because of its <br />applicability to uranium processing operations (40 CRF 192.12, 6 CCR 1007-1 part 18). <br /> <br />All of the above areas are considered to be successfully decommissioned (see Section 1.3)., The <br />OWTP area structures and underlying soils (RML #2) and the NWTP IX equipment remain to be <br />addressed with respect to release from license and termination of the RML. For RML #2, the <br />CDPHE has indicated that a dose-based standard of 25 mrem/yr will be used to determine soil <br />cleanup criteria (CDPHE, 2001b). For RML #4, no soil removal activities are expected with <br />decommissioning activities limited to radiological surveys of the building surfaces and IX <br />treatment system equipment. <br /> <br />2.3 Background Characteristics <br />2.3.1 Direct Gamma Exposure Monitoring <br />The lithology and mineralogy of the opposing valley slopes at the Schwartzwalder Mine site are <br />quite different. The sandstone, mudstone, and clay rock types of the east-northeast valley side, <br />where the nearest feasible receptor resides, are associated with higher background gamma counts <br />than the metamorphic gneiss and schist rock types of the west -northwest side, where the licensed <br />facilities are located. This difference in lithology confounds the use of TLD measurements for <br />background subtraction at this site. To quantify this problem Cotter proposed the placement of <br />ten TLDs on the east-northeast side of the valley for a period of one year. This proposal was <br />approved by the CDPHE and monitoring began on April 1, 1988 and was completed in 1989. <br />The average annual background gamma dose rate for the ten locations studied was measured as <br />184 mrem (approximately equivalent to a gamma exposure rate of 21µR/h). <br /> <br />2.3.2 Soil Background Assessment <br />Cotter performed assessments of local background radiological soil characteristics during <br />cleanup activities at the ore transfer pad, and the results were reported in the OTP Release Report <br />(Cotter, 1998). Given the natural geology around the mine, along with environmental gamma <br />monitoring results, it is possible that background uranium and Ra-226 concentrations in soils at <br />the mine site are higher than values reported near the OTP, but direct measures in this area have <br />never been established. A reasonable approach for estimating background is to assume values <br />reported for background soil samples taken in the vicinity of the ore transfer pad (approximately