Laserfiche WebLink
The Grand Mesa, Uncompaghre and Gunnison National Forests (GMUG) overlie the mine. The GMUG <br />has been negatively impacted by climate change in recent years, and therefore, GMUG management is <br />actively practicing what the Department of Agriculture (DoA) terms, "climate smartness". This involves <br />managing the forest's natural resources to be resilient to disturbances like wildfires, insect and disease <br />infestations and frequent, extreme weather events. These are events that can be attributed to climate <br />change, and reducing methane emissions supports the DoA program and USFS's efforts in practicing <br />climate smartness. <br />Post -mine drainage from the surface <br />Design and installation of the GVBs used in this analysis incorporate best practices and the safety <br />features that West Elk currently employs, including flame arresters and safety controls and monitoring, <br />as well as all safety practices normally utilized in the oil and gas industry. It is also envisioned that all <br />access roads and gas gathering lines will utilize existing roads and right-of-ways, not requiring any <br />additional surface disturbance. Placement and timing of the drilling of GVBs will still be supervised by <br />the mine and the length of time that the GVBs produce must be managed by mine personnel, as they <br />are now, so as not to allow the gas concentration of any well to approach explosives levels. Our analysis <br />has shown that MCC typically operates GVBs as long as mining continues on a longwall panel, but if <br />desired, mine management could operate many of the GVBs for longer periods. With a methane <br />mitigation system in place, this would allow for the destruction of more gas rather than eventually <br />allowing it to escape through the ventilation system. <br />Abatement of drained CMM from GVBs <br />Several end -uses for the gob gas were considered in this study, but after a preliminary evaluation, flaring <br />was determined to be the most cost-effective and economic at this time. Our conceptual design <br />envisions that available GVB production from the new leasehold will be gathered and transported to a <br />central location along existing roads and right-of-ways within the new leasehold boundary where an <br />enclosed flare will be sited; no additional roads or right-of-ways will be required for gas gathering <br />operations. Drained gas will be treated at the wellhead so that the moisture in the gas will not freeze, <br />and then transported via 6 -inch SDR 111 plastic pipe to the flare site. <br />The proposed flare, which will be an enclosed flare designed to destroy drained gas at 99.9 percent <br />efficiency, would be mounted onto a concrete pad with an additional four feet of buffer, and <br />surrounded by an enclosed fence. It will be designed to avoid over firing of the unit which could lead to <br />air starvation and incomplete combustion. The unit is designed to shut off in cases of over firing or any <br />type of instability in the operation. Immediately prior to shutdown, the system is equipped with a purge <br />blower which creates a safe atmosphere within the flare, ensuring that no flames escape out the top. <br />The system is also equipped with a UV scanner; if the pilot flame is lost, the main flame automatically <br />shuts down. During all shutdown cases, the system immediately goes into safe mode, whereas gas is <br />prohibited from contact with the flare unit. Also, the flare chamber is internally lined with refractory <br />material, minimizing the impact of the flare on the outside shell temperature which further reduces any <br />1 SDR 11 means that the outside diameter of the pipe is eleven times the thickness of the pipe wall. <br />11 <br />