My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-05-31_REVISION - C1980007 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2018-05-31_REVISION - C1980007 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2018 10:21:06 AM
Creation date
6/6/2018 9:23:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/31/2018
Doc Name
Comment Forwarded To Applicant
From
Sue Navy
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR15
Email Name
LDS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 31, 2018 <br />Ginny Brannon, Director <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />Via email: drms.temp@state.co.us <br />Re: West Elk Mine PR -15 <br />Dear Ms. Brannon, <br />I am writing to encourage you to deny the West Elk Mine the ability to expand its <br />operations by entering into, and thereby defacing, the Sunset Roadless Area. Furthering <br />the coal industry's incursions into Gunnison County would only exacerbate existing <br />climate issues, and bring long-term impacts to roadless areas and beyond. <br />Gunnison County is already in need of air quality improvement. In an article in the <br />Crested Butte News in November, 2016, David Inouye, a renowned scientist in Gothic, <br />Colorado, reported that Gunnison County gets a "C" rating from the American Lung <br />Association report card. The organization monitored air quality in the county for 17 <br />years. Inouye attributes this unfortunate and unhealthy grade to oil and gas production <br />in the county and elsewhere. Coal production from the West Elk Mine, with its <br />attendant methane venting, is a major contributor to air pollution and climate change as <br />well. <br />There are currently no plans for methane capture, and even with methane capture <br />there would still be the impacts of roads and development on wildlife, streams and <br />aquatic life in the area. It would take many years for the roads to be reclaimed, if ever, <br />even after the short-lived (several years) mine ceased to operate. We should not have <br />to bear these long-term impacts to an area that has been declared "Roadless" thanks to <br />its untrammeled nature. Surely our roadless forests deserve better protection than the <br />incursion of a coal company would bring. <br />As we are becoming increasingly cognizant of the impacts climate change -causing <br />agents are having on our environment, it only makes sense to not exacerbate the <br />problem by creating more opportunities for carbon pollution. Instead, let's focus on <br />renewable energy which will one day soon eliminate any need for coal production. <br />Please don't add to the problems we already face locally, nationally and worldwide. We <br />already need to remediate damages from historic mining, both from coal and heavy <br />metals. Let's leave the Sunset Roadless Area alone, so that it can support the wildlife <br />that inhabit it along with the communities that depend on the ecosystem and <br />recreational services it provides. <br />I hope you will make a wise decision on this issue by denying PR -15. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.