Laserfiche WebLink
Section - 2.05.6 <br />Surface Mining_Near Underground Mining <br />All historical, existing, and proposed mining operations in the mine permit and adjacent areas have <br />been, are, ox will involve underground mining methods. Given site topography and the location and <br />occurrence of the minable coal seams, the potential for any surface mining in the immediaate area is <br />_____nte. Gipv_n t}?at th PrP is nn it c'_Arby cl_lrfarP M=ning, fl]1S YYOll~atnrV Seffilln i$ nnr annllCa}ll P. <br />- D J l l <br />Subsidence Survey, Subsidence Monitoring, And Subsidence Control <br />It has been determined that no renewable resource lands and a limited number of certain structures <br />are present within the permit and adjacent aeeas. A detailed inventory and description of the <br />structures that could potentially be affected by mining-related subsidence along with a subsidence <br />control and monitoring plan are presented in Exhibit 2.05-E8, Subsidence Control and Monitoring. <br />The following discussion is a general summary of the current conditions, historical subsidence <br />experience, and existing and proposed control, mitigation, and monitoring considerations and <br />measures. <br />Inventory of Structures and Renewable Resource Lands - Structures located within and <br />immediately adjacent to the permit area are shown on the General Facilities Map (Map 2.05-M1) and <br />the Mine Plan Map (Map 2.05-M2}. The majority of the structures in the immediate area are owned <br />and controlled by OMLLC, however, there are a Few privately-owned houses or other structures <br />within or adjacent to the permit area. The Union Pacific railroad line, State Highway 133, Mountain <br />Coal Company's rail load out and Delta-Montrose Electric Association powerlines exist on or cross <br />the south edge of the permit area. The maps also show the predicted area of influence from potential <br />subsidence. <br />The Existing Topography and Land Use Map, (Map 2.04-M1} also shows the location of any <br />surrounding structures, the lack of any renewable resources as a pre-mining land use within the <br />affected areas and the lack of areas used For agriculture or silvicultural production of food and fiber <br />and pasturelands. The predominate use for those portions of the pexntit azea designated as <br />"undeveloped" lands aze rangeland and wildlife uses. <br />In addition, the "Final Environmental Impact Statement; Iron Point Exploration License, Iron Point ",rr~ <br />Coal Lease Tract; Elk Creek Coal Lease Tract; Delta and Gunnison Counties, Colorado", USDI-BLM V° <br />and USDA-Forest Service, February 2000 (EIS) states on page 3-90 "That portion of the forest ~ <br />within which the project area lies has not been subject to intensive logging or forest management ~ <br />practices. Most desirable timber species occur on slopes too steep or are located in drainages too <br />narrow for efficient logging to occur. Typically, slopes oven 40 percent are not subject to commercial <br />logging Qones, 1999a)." The EIS relied upon information found within the BLM Uncompahgre <br />Basin Resource Management Plan (RMP) completed and approved in July 1989 and the amended <br />USFS Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) dated September 1991. Observations by <br />ONILLC personnel and conversations with local ranchers in the area axe consistent with the EIS <br />findings. <br />In accordance with Rule 2.05.6(6)(a)(i), if an inventory shows no structures or renewable resource <br />lands exist within the affected area, no further information must be supplied regarding subsidence. <br />OMLLC is therefore not proposing to perform any additional subsidence monitoring other than that <br />which is ongoing to monitor historic, existing landslide features. See the section "Subsidence <br />Monitoring Program" fox details of this program. <br />Worst Case Consequences to Structures and Renewable Resource Lands - In general, as <br />indicated by the maps previously referenced, the majority of the existing structures are outside of the <br />predicted area of influence from potential subsidence-related impacts. For those structures within the <br />area of influence, the worst case consequence to these structures, in the unlikely event it occurred, <br />PROS 2.05-102 Revised September 2002 <br />