Laserfiche WebLink
Deep Cut LLC - 22 West Pit Page 15 <br /> Adequacy response 01 Permit # M-2017-032 <br /> i. Costs for backfilling the post-1981 exposed groundwater to two feet above static water level will be <br /> required if the applicant is unable to provide a letter from the SEO demonstrating the appropriate <br /> amount of water shares have been committed for augmentation. In this case, the applicant will need to <br /> submit additional information in this exhibit, including source of backfill material,push or haul <br /> distance for transporting backfill material to reclamation areas, and estimated volume of backfill <br /> material required. To be adequately bonded for commencement of the first mining phase where the <br /> ponds are connected,the applicant would need to provide costs for backfilling the additional <br /> groundwater exposure. <br /> There is no need for this calculation at this time. A SWSP was filed on 5/2/2018 to cover <br /> the post 1981 water in the 22 West Pit. A copy is provided to the Division. We expect to <br /> have the SWSP approved before it takes affect on August 1, 2018. At the current time the <br /> lake area is covered by a Valco, Inc, Well Permit - Number 10525F-R and the associated <br /> Substitute Water Supply Plan that expires on July 31, 2018. <br /> Exhibit M —Other Permits and Licenses (Rule 6.4.13): <br /> 36) In the list provided on page 64 of the application, Item no. 3 states that only a well permit and <br /> Substitute Water Supply Plan will be obtained to cover the post-1981 exposed groundwater. However, <br /> the Division will require a water court approved augmentation plan be obtained to cover all exposed <br /> groundwater on site prior to final release. Please revise this item accordingly. <br /> Text was added to Item 3 as you suggest. A revised copy has been provided for the file. <br /> Exhibit S— Permanent Man-Made Structures (Rule 6.4.19): <br /> 37) Please be sure all water wells located within 200 feet of the proposed affected land boundary (identified <br /> in Exhibit G) are included in the structure list. <br /> All water wells have been verbified and are shown on all maps. There is only one well not <br /> owned by the current landowner. Exhibit S was revised to add the Valco Well that was <br /> missing. <br /> 38) Please be sure all structures and structure owners identified in this exhibit are clearly labeled on an <br /> Exhibit C map. The Division was unable to locate all identified structures on the Exhibit C maps <br /> submitted. <br /> All structures within 200 feet of the permit line have been verified and labeled on the <br /> revised C maps. <br /> Items 39 thru 43 concern the Divisions decision to declare the signed structure agreement as unacceptable <br /> due to incorrect dates. We know that the date changes were made by the respective notaries even if they <br /> failed to initial each change Mr. Tomky recognizes them as valid agreements. The affected structure <br /> owners are being given the opportunity to correct the problems and if any chose to make the revisions a <br /> copy of the revised agreements will be sent to the Division for the file. <br /> Mr. Tomky is working to obtained corrected structure agreements for Valco (39) a new <br /> Agreement was completed to add the missing well; getting Mr. Tomky's notary to correct the <br /> date for his signature on the Southeast Power Association (41) agreement and have the <br />