My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-05-18_PERMIT FILE - C2009087A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2009087
>
2018-05-18_PERMIT FILE - C2009087A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2022 6:55:05 AM
Creation date
5/24/2018 10:37:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/18/2018
Doc Name
Mitigation of the Impacts of Mining Operations
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05.6 Mitigation of the Impacts of Mining Operations
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 - PERMITS <br />In addition, the potential for drawdown to affect the gaining reach of Grassy Creek (see Robson and <br />Stewart, 1990, Table 3, Grassy Creek Stations shown on p. 38), where the creek crosses the <br />outcrops of the Trout Creek Sandstone and Williams Fork Formation at the southwestern perimeter <br />of the PSCM permit area, and springs in that area, is minimal. As explained in more detail in the <br />paragraph below, the Twentymile and Trout Creek aquifers are hydrologically isolated from the <br />Wadge coal and so will not be affected by mining- related drawdown. Consequently, there would be <br />no change in streamflow gains or losses where the stream crosses the sandstone outcrops and no <br />potential for springs related to either sandstone to be affected. The subcrop of the Wadge coal <br />beneath the gaining reach of Grassy Creek is outside of the predicted 5 -foot drawdown contour and <br />so will not be affected by mine - related drawdown during the permit period. In the scenarios where <br />drawdown was calculated using the expected and high values of transmissivity and hydraulic <br />conductivity, the 5 -foot drawdown contour could reach the area where the Wadge coal subcrops <br />beneath the alluvium after 12 to 19 years. In the scenario where drawdown was calculated using the <br />low values, the 5 -foot drawdown contour would not reach that area. The springs in the vicinity of <br />the southwestern perimeter of the PSCM permit area are generally not associated with bedrock <br />aquifers and are most commonly associated with perched groundwater, where discontinuous units <br />of higher permeability are underlain by beds with lower permeability. Springs are generally not <br />affected by underground mining except where they lie within potential subsidence zones. The <br />springs in the area near the southwestern perimeter of the permit area are not within potential <br />subsidence zones. In addition, the springs lie on the margins of the Twentymile Park structural <br />basin, and recharge areas are upgradient of the springs and the proposed mining activities, so it is <br />unlikely that recharge to the springs will be impacted. <br />• The vertical extent of potentiometric head changes in the bedrock units will be limited by the low <br />permeability and thickness of shale beds above and below the Wadge coal. Previous studies, as well <br />as monitoring at the nearby Foidel Creek Mine, indicate that the major regional sandstone aquifers <br />(the Twentymile and Trout Creek aquifers), which occur, respectively, approximately 600 feet <br />above and 235 feet below the Wadge coal, are hydrologically isolated from the Wadge coal and the <br />small section of the overburden unit to be disturbed by mining at the PSCM. They are therefore <br />unlikely to be affected by the proposed mining. The isolation is created by the very small hydraulic <br />conductivities of the intervening shale sequences above and below the Wadge coal and its <br />overburden and underburden. The interval separating the Wadge coal from the overlying <br />Twentymile aquifer includes approximately 540 feet of marine shale. Shale samples from this area <br />tested for vertical permeability, as reported by Williams and Clark (1994), gave values less than 10 <br />ft/d. The interval separating the Wadge coal from underlying Trout Creek aquifer includes shale <br />beds and a hydrologically - significant, regionally- extensive bed of altered volcanic ash (kaolinitic <br />claystone, or "tonstein ") referred to as the Yampa Bed by Brownfield and Johnson (2008). Where <br />tested in other areas (Water Management Consultants (WMC), 2005), the Yampa Bed exhibited a <br />vertical hydraulic conductivity of 2.8x 10 -7 ft/d, about the same as or less than that of the shales <br />reported by Williams and Clark (1994). <br />The spoils aquifer in the Seneca II spoils adjacent to the proposed underground mining activities is <br />upgradient of and in hydrologic connection with the units to be disturbed by the mining. However, <br />as described below and, in greater detail, by Williams and Clark (1994), it is unlikely to be <br />detestably impacted by the proposed PSCM activities. The spoils aquifer receives about ten times <br />the recharge as adjacent undisturbed bedrock areas (approximately 3 inches per year, versus 0.31 <br />• inch per year in other areas, according to Williams and Clark, 1994). The spoils aquifer also has a <br />hydraulic conductivity hundreds of times greater than that of the undisturbed bedrock. Because of <br />these factors, the spoils aquifer is saturated to the elevation of the down -dip low wall of the spoils - <br />filled reclaimed mine pit, and "overflow" exits the spoils aquifer as springs at the low points in the <br />low wall adjacent to Little Grassy Creek. <br />PSCM Permit App. 2.05 -77.3 Revision 03/05/10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.