My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-05-22_PERMIT FILE - M2018027 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2018027
>
2018-05-22_PERMIT FILE - M2018027 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2021 5:41:09 PM
Creation date
5/22/2018 4:31:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2018027
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
5/22/2018
Doc Name
Application
From
David Hunt
To
DRMS
Email Name
ECS
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. David W. Hunt <br /> May 13, 2018 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Dry Unit Moist Unit Saturated Unit <br /> Weight(pco Weight(pco Weight(pco Cohesion C'psf Friction Angle 0'° <br /> 116 Peak= 126 Peak= 135 Peak= 100 Peak=25 <br /> Residual = 110 Residual = 133 Residual=0 Residual = 15 <br /> Soil-Bentonite Slurry Wall <br /> The proposed slurry wall will consist of a mix of the overburden clayey to silty sand, alluvial sand, and imported <br /> bentonite. The resulting mix will produce a non-Newtonian fluid with some shear strength characteristics based on a <br /> reduced friction angle of the overlying overburden. Based on engineering judgment,we modeled the slurry wall as <br /> follows: <br /> Dry Unit Moist Unit Saturated Unit <br /> Weight(pco Weight(pco Weight(pco Cohesion C'psf Friction Angle 4ti'° <br /> NA 112 115 0 0 <br /> STABILITY ANALYSES RESULTS <br /> The stability analyses assumed the mining will be per the mine plan. The plan includes dry mining in both cells as the <br /> water level in the main cell will be controlled by the slurry wall and mining in the other cell will be above the groundwater <br /> table. The perimeter mine slopes of both cells will be no steeper than 3H:1 V. <br /> Setbacks listed in Table 1 (below) indicate the setback from the structure to the mining limits. The setback distance can <br /> be increased as needed to address other restrictions. <br /> The factor of safety shown below is the minimum factor of safety of the three conditions listed above. <br /> TABLE 1 -SLOPE STABILITY RESULTS AND SETBACKS <br /> Section Location Critical Structure Static Factor of Seismic Factor of DRMS Draft FOS <br /> Structure Setback From Safety at Safety at Structure Requirement <br /> Mine Limit ft Structure 0.084 hor Static/Quake <br /> 1 Main Cell West Gas Line 30 1.95 1.45 1.5/1.3 <br /> (most critical <br /> section <br /> 2 Main Cell East Phone 70 2.27 1.58 1.5/1.3 <br /> weaker soil Line <br /> 3 Main Cell West Gas Line 115 2.63 1.79 1.5/1.3 <br /> dee est mining) <br /> 4 Main Cell Oil Burner 115 2.76 1.86 1.5/1.3 <br /> Northwest <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> The mining setback will be 30-feet from the high wall to the slurry wall or nearest structure. Based on the Factors of <br /> Safety listed in the table above,the mine will not be a hazard to neighboring structures provided the structure and slurry <br /> wall offsets, as well as the perimeter mine slopes, follow the mine plan. <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> Our review is based on regional geologic mapping, present mining plans, and in part borehole data by Civil Resources <br /> and Earth Engineering Consultants. Stability analyses were performed using typical strength parameters for the various <br /> strata in the critical sections. Should the mining plans change or subsurface conditions vary from those portrayed in this <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.